BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

US's vacationers

Expert replies
by SmarpanGamt » Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:54 am
In the United States, vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called "pure aquariums" but for fewer than one quarter of all visitors to zoos, which usually include a "zoo aquarium" of relatively modest scope.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the difference described above between visitors to zoos and visitors to pure aquariums?

(A) In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo.
(B) Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos, whereas only a few large metropolitan areas have pure aquariums.
(C) Over the last ten years, newly constructed pure aquariums have outnumbered newly established zoos by a factor of two to one.
(D) People who visit a zoo in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are people who do not visit a zoo.
(E) The zoo aquariums of zoos that are in the same city as a pure aquarium tend to be smaller than the aquariums of zoos that have no pure aquarium nearby.

Please explain each choice above. Thank you
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by shovan85 » Fri Oct 22, 2010 2:42 am
Have confusion between B and E

Premises say
Vacationers > 50%(Visitor) ---> Pure Aquarium
Vacationers < 25%(Visitor) ---> Zoo Aquarium

The difference can be attributed to following:
1. Zoo lots and lots of local people go so Vacationers are outnumbered.
2. The region vacationers belong have zoos(not necessarily with Aquarium) but no pure aquarium

Option
A says "Local residents to Pure Aqua" -- Discard
C "If Pure is ubiquitous then why more vacationers?" --Discard
D "Whatever people go to Aquarium more than zoo but does not explain the %age of vacationers" -- Discard

E says "Where Pure aqua is there smaller Zoo Aqua is present" and B says "less metropolitan cities have Pure Aqua".

Usage of Metropolitan makes me skeptical but still IMO B as E depends on the size of Aquarium.
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion

by SmarpanGamt » Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:24 am
I couldn't get the understanding of Primises ( Stimulus) Itself. Can i have some more explaination. Thank you
Join the discussion

by shovan85 » Fri Oct 22, 2010 4:03 am
SmarpanGamt wrote:I couldn't get the understanding of Primises ( Stimulus) Itself. Can i have some more explaination. Thank you
Can we have the OA? If it is wrong I may lead you to a wrong idea :(

Premises say Vacationers/Visitors (the ration) is more in Pure Aquarium than Zoo Aquarium
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion

by SmarpanGamt » Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:42 pm
OA is B
Join the discussion