BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

US Election

Expert replies
by perfectstranger » Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:25 am
Last year in the United States, women who ran for
state and national offices were about as likely to win as men. However, only about fifteen percent of the candidates for these offices were women. Therefore, the reason there are so few women who win elections for these offices is not that women have difficulty winning elections but that so few women want to run.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion given?

(A) Last year the proportion of women incumbents who won reelection was smaller than the proportion of men incumbents who won reelection.
(B) Few women who run for state and national offices run against other women.
(C) Most women who have no strong desire to be politicians never run for state and national offices.
(D) The proportion of people holding local offices who are women is smaller than the proportion of people holding state and national offices who are women.
(E) Many more women than men who want to run for
state and national offices do not because they
cannot get adequate funding for their campaigns.

Please explain the assumption behind it. A detailed explanation will be welcome.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by raunekk » Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:46 am
IMO:D

Explanation if its d OA...

thx
Join the discussion

by sumant1808 » Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:47 am
Arg:- Less number of women are successful in election not because they have diff. in winning the election but they dont want to contest in elections.

Assumptions:- There is no other reason for to explain the scenario.

Possible cause:- What if there is some other problem, May be most of the women are housewives or something like that can be a possibility.


(A) Last year the proportion of women incumbents who won reelection was smaller than the proportion of men incumbents who won reelection.
Irrelevant (-)
(B) Few women who run for state and national offices run against other women. Hmmmm...(?)
(C) Most women who have no strong desire to be politicians never run for state and national offices. Irrelevant...we are looking for reason..(-)
(D) The proportion of people holding local offices who are women is smaller than the proportion of people holding state and national offices who are women. we are not interested in thsi....(-)
(E) Many more women than men who want to run for
state and national offices do not because they cannot get adequate funding for their campaigns. This is the one.. Alternate explanation.. (+)
Terrified by the GMAT
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Sun Jul 27, 2008 4:03 am
Oh now i see it..

I missed that point..

I thought E supports d conclusion...--that more women are not able to run...ie fewer women run...


thx
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:51 pm
Hi,

Whats the OA ?
Can any one explain why option B cannot be the correct choice?

Regards,
Vignesh
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Wed May 11, 2016 2:51 am
I feel the answer will be D
Join the discussion