BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Until Rousseau no intellectual had unequivocally declared th

Expert replies
by sanjib » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:54 am
Until Rousseau no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.





no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was



no intellectual unequivocally declared that human evil was from a source in



no intellectual had unequivocally declared that human evil had its source in



no intellectual unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was



no intellectual had an unequivocal declaration that the source of human evil was


Which is right between A and C . Pls explain
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by mrupapara » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:43 am
I am with C, because "source in" is better.

OA please
Join the discussion

by glorydefined » Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:53 am
I am between A or D. But A sounds better as the sentence is in past perfect and usage of "had" is appropriate..

C is incorrect as it changes the meaning..
Join the discussion

by Mayur Sand » Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:16 pm
A is definitely better then C , C is wordy and "source of" is better then "source in"
Join the discussion

by gmatv09 » Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:17 pm
another vote for A.

In C, this doesnt sound right to me:
"..that human evil had its source in ..."
Join the discussion

by arorag » Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:01 pm
it should be D
no need for past perfect tense
Join the discussion

by Beat-D-GMAT » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:39 pm
it should be D
OA plz.
Join the discussion

by srivas » Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:09 pm
I too feel it is D
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by sunnyjohn » Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:03 am
A is 100% out.

This is concept of Indirect Speech. so Verb form in that clause should be similar to main clause or it can be of early form.
was in main clause - had in that clause.

I m confuse between C and D.

In D, I have a feeling that 'declared' is not a working verb. So I will go C.

Wat is OA?
Join the discussion

by mankey » Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:40 am
IMO:D.

Can some expert, please guide us to the right answer.

Can "had" ever be used with "until" or is it always the simple past?

Kindly help.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1