BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Unsure about this Noun Modifier

Expert replies
by Niner710 » Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:24 am
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington
Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few
years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and
ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886.
outnumbering
her letters to anyone else.

OA is (E)

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period
beginning a few years before Susan's marriage
to Emily's brother and ending shortly before
Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

I don't understand the "which were written over a period...etc" here. It seems like it is modifying Susan Huntington Dickinson which would seem incorrect. Is which modifying the whole clause then?(Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson) I thought only an -ING form could do that. Any help would be great. Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by hrishi19884 » Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:14 am
Hello Niner,

Please use the Spoiler next time to hide the answers. Also, do make sure you write remaining choices also so it would be better to explain it to you. :-)

Explanation : The main clause here is " Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson [spoiler](when)[/spoiler] outnumber her letters to anyone else.

Now, if you see the spoiler, the part (when) consists of the secondary clause --->It indicates when did that happen?

ans is "which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886"

Hence, "Emily Dickinson's letters to ..." correctly modifies "outnumber her letters to anyone else"

Hope you get it ;-)
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:10 am
Niner710 wrote:Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington
Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few
years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and
ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886.
outnumbering
her letters to anyone else.

OA is (E)

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period
beginning a few years before Susan's marriage
to Emily's brother and ending shortly before
Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

I don't understand the "which were written over a period...etc" here. It seems like it is modifying Susan Huntington Dickinson which would seem incorrect. Is which modifying the whole clause then?(Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson) I thought only an -ING form could do that. Any help would be great. Thanks!
Here which should refer to letters... because there is a WERE after which ...
So which should refer to a noun which agrees in number also...

Thus which doesn't always refers to the noun preceding it..
it refers to a noun which should agree in verb also...

Hope it helps...

I read it somewhere in BTG post.. i think it was Ron's post about use of "which"...
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Fri Dec 25, 2009 6:55 pm
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1