Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Bob Wilber

Expert replies
by Chaitanya_1986 » Wed May 11, 2011 10:51 am
Bob Wilber became Sidney Bechet’s student and protégé when he was nineteen and, for a few years in the 1940’s, came as close to being a carbon copy of the jazz virtuoso in performance as anyone has ever come.
(A) as anyone has ever come
(B) as anyone ever had been
(C) as anyone ever had done
(D) that anyone ever did
(E) that anyone ever came


OA A
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by HSPA » Wed May 11, 2011 5:07 pm
1) as close as
2) parallel wording : came
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by Chaitanya_1986 » Wed May 11, 2011 9:56 pm
Hey HSPA/ Others could you please why the usage of had is wrong here??? I thought had is correct because it happened in past and ended some time in past and its still not continuing...But since answer is A.

Could any one explain this paradox?
Join the discussion

by sandy217 » Wed May 18, 2011 7:05 am
Chaitanya_1986 wrote:Hey HSPA/ Others could you please why the usage of had is wrong here??? I thought had is correct because it happened in past and ended some time in past and its still not continuing...But since answer is A.

Could any one explain this paradox?
Am worried noone answered your question
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/bob ... t4297.html

Check Ron's explanation !!

Summary for thread visitors:
Usage of both" had and has " is correct here.But they convey different meanings.As we retain the meaning of the original sentence(as it makes sense) B cannot be correct.
One more reason is placement of ever, this is also distorted (compared to original sentence).
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Wed May 18, 2011 8:54 am
Hi Chaitanya,

usage of "had" is wrong because initial part of the sentence talks about "came" but option B talks about "ever had been" both of which are not in the same direction.........i hope it clears
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed May 18, 2011 1:24 pm
Chaitanya_1986 wrote:Hey HSPA/ Others could you please why the usage of had is wrong here??? I thought had is correct because it happened in past and ended some time in past and its still not continuing...But since answer is A.

Could any one explain this paradox?
Hi,

based on the original sentence, it is still happening - that's exactly why we use has.

Unless there's an egregious error in the original, we should take the original to be an accurate picture of the author's intended meaning. Since the author says "has ever come", the author must mean that, even to this day, no one has come closer to being a carbon copy of Bechet as did Wilber.

Changing to "had ever come" alters the meaning of the sentence and should, accordingly, be avoided.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion