It is important that we look at these options critically to examine which of the options would be suitable enough for consideration.

From Option A, it is not a necessity to repeat what has been previously said since the aim of the writer is to see things differently albeit with the same meaning. It is sure to be an INCORRECT Option.

Going down the lane, the statement credited to the writer in Option B is such that there exits much emphasis and stress on the Keywords. ''wrote'' would still have appeared without been written in the meaning. Hence, it is INCORRECT.

The statement in Option C ''unlike his colleagues'' is specific in subject and doesn't really need to buttress much on the phrase used here. However, it is the most CORRECT of all the options so far reviewed.

In Option D, comes a poorly arranged statement lacking in grammatical correctness. His mission isn't to oppose anyone but to do things differently which isn't captured effectively in this option. Hence, it is an INCORRECT option.

The sentence in option E, explains that the statement is in consonance with that in option B. It is too emphatic and ambiguous. Unfortunately, it is INCORRECT.