BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Tue Jul 10, 2018 6:14 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress, the government's argument centered on what many legal experts consider a main-stream interpretation of the Bill of Rights.


A) the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

B) the argument from the petitioner, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

C) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

D) the petitioner's argument, whose case rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress

E) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ceilidh.erickson » Sat Jul 14, 2018 8:30 am
This question is testing COMPARISONS and MODIFIERS.

Whenever a sentence begins with a comparison signal like "unlike" or "like," we must make sure that we're comparing logically comparable ideas. In the original sentence, we have "Unlike the team of lawyers..., the government's argument centered..."

It does not make logical sense to compare a team to an argument. Since the main clause ("the government's argument...") is not underlined, we need something that says "Unlike one argument..., another argument..." Eliminate A.

"The argument from the petitioner" and "the petitioner's argument" are both comparable to "the government's argument," so there is no need to choose between those. We must now look to the modifying clause that comes after.
- if it says "the argument from the petitioner," the clause that follows should begin with "whose," modifying the petitioner. Eliminate B.
- if it says "the petitioner's argument," the clause that follows should begin with "which," modifying the argument. Eliminate D.

We are left with C and E, which at a quick glance might seem identical. But observe the difference:

C) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

E) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress


The difference between these two is in the placement of the modifier "only." When modifiers move, they change the meaning! In C, "only" is modifying "recently" - i.e. it did not happen in the past, it only happened recently. In E, "only" is modifying "passed" - i.e. it only passed Congress, it didn't do anything else. This doesn't make much sense.

That leaves us with C.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion


• Page 1 of 1