BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Tue Jul 10, 2018 6:14 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress, the government's argument centered on what many legal experts consider a main-stream interpretation of the Bill of Rights.


A) the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

B) the argument from the petitioner, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

C) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

D) the petitioner's argument, whose case rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress

E) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ceilidh.erickson » Sat Jul 14, 2018 8:30 am
This question is testing COMPARISONS and MODIFIERS.

Whenever a sentence begins with a comparison signal like "unlike" or "like," we must make sure that we're comparing logically comparable ideas. In the original sentence, we have "Unlike the team of lawyers..., the government's argument centered..."

It does not make logical sense to compare a team to an argument. Since the main clause ("the government's argument...") is not underlined, we need something that says "Unlike one argument..., another argument..." Eliminate A.

"The argument from the petitioner" and "the petitioner's argument" are both comparable to "the government's argument," so there is no need to choose between those. We must now look to the modifying clause that comes after.
- if it says "the argument from the petitioner," the clause that follows should begin with "whose," modifying the petitioner. Eliminate B.
- if it says "the petitioner's argument," the clause that follows should begin with "which," modifying the argument. Eliminate D.

We are left with C and E, which at a quick glance might seem identical. But observe the difference:

C) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

E) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress


The difference between these two is in the placement of the modifier "only." When modifiers move, they change the meaning! In C, "only" is modifying "recently" - i.e. it did not happen in the past, it only happened recently. In E, "only" is modifying "passed" - i.e. it only passed Congress, it didn't do anything else. This doesn't make much sense.

That leaves us with C.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion


• Page 1 of 1