BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Un-American

Expert replies
by ru2008 » Mon May 10, 2010 5:19 pm
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal requirements for driver's licenses that would allow them to be used as part of a national identification system. Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American because it would require U.S. citizens to carry the equivalent of "papers." Such a requirement would allow the government to restrict their movements and activities in the manner of totalitarian regimes. In time, this could make other limits on freedom acceptable.

The author assumes which of the following?

The next presidential election will be dishonest, as has happened in eastern European countries.

The government will soon start curtailing the activities of those it considers "dissidents."

Blanket restrictions on law-abiding individuals are contrary to the traditions of American culture and law.

The majority of Americans are not willing to give up their right to travel and move about without identification.

Americans should resist all government regulation of their lives.

--> What is the conclusion of this argument and Why????
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by paddle_sweep » Mon May 10, 2010 9:30 pm
IMO it's D. Pls post OA.
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Mon May 10, 2010 10:05 pm
IMO C ,OA pl.
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Mon May 10, 2010 11:19 pm
I will go with C 'Blanket restrictions on law-abiding individuals are contrary to the traditions of American culture and law. '

Author says that the proposal is 'un-America' i.e author has assuming that the proposal does not go with certain common tradition/belief of Americans--only option C states this

hence C
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by saurabhmahajan » Tue May 11, 2010 2:53 am
+1 for C....OA plz.
Join the discussion

by ru2008 » Tue May 11, 2010 10:20 am
OA is C
Join the discussion

by ru2008 » Tue May 11, 2010 10:21 am
How did you think about this problem? What is the conclusion here?
Join the discussion

by xyztroy » Tue May 11, 2010 12:53 pm
Conclusion is: Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American

Only C as an assumption confirm this conclusion.
ru2008 wrote:How did you think about this problem? What is the conclusion here?
Join the discussion

by ru2008 » Tue May 11, 2010 8:36 pm
Couldnt 'Such a requirement' also be a conclusion?
Join the discussion

by vineetbatra » Wed May 12, 2010 3:08 pm
I agree why is "Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American" the conclusion

In time, this could make other limits on freedom acceptable

The conclusion could be this also. Typically how I look at the conclusion is chronology

X is Un - American

Therefore X could lead to more restrictions eventually and hence something that is un acceptable today may be acceptable tomorrow.

Thats the flow....?
Join the discussion