BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

uition tax credits

Expert replies
by bleacherseat » Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:35 pm
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents whose children attend private schools maintain that people making no use of a government service should not be forced to pay for it. Yet those who choose to buy bottled water rather than drink water from the local supply are not therefore exempt from paying taxes to maintain the local water supply.
Roger: Your argument is illogical. Children are required by law to attend school. Since school attendance is a matter not of choice, but of legal requirement, it is unfair for the government to force some parents to pay for it twice.

Which of the following responses by Gloria would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical?

(A) Although drinking water is not required by law, it is necessary for all people, and therefore my analogy is appropriate.
(B) Those who can afford the tuition at a high-priced private school can well bear the same tax burden as those whose children attend public schools.
(C) If tuition tax credits are granted, the tax burden on parents who choose public schools will rise to an intolerable level.
(D) The law does not say that parents must send their children to private schools, only that the children must attend some kind of school, whether public or private.
(E) Both bottled water and private schools are luxury items, and it is unfair that some citizens should be able to afford them while others cannot.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmat009 » Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:56 pm
IMO D
Join the discussion

by bleacherseat » Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:19 pm
OA is A.

I picked D
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:50 pm
bleacherseat wrote:OA is A.

I picked D
Weird ans.......
I still cann't figure why would he say that........
May be I am missing something if OA is correct.....
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:14 pm
I pick D as well
bleacherseat - what's the source?
Join the discussion

by pbanavara » Wed Oct 15, 2008 10:32 pm
It has to be proven that Gloria's argument is logical:

So parents who send their kids to private schools should not be given a tax credit
Analogy: Even though one uses bottled water, they still pay for basic water services offered.

Reason to be refuted: Schooling is required by law.
To refute the reason : Prove that drinking water is also required by law OR take it a step further and prove that access to drinking water is something superior to just being a law requirement.

Option A States this

I had to work backwards from the options using elimination.

Hope this helps.

-pradeep
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Wed Oct 15, 2008 11:13 pm
pbanavara wrote:It has to be proven that Gloria's argument is logical:
shouldn't we be proving that Roger's argument is flawed?
Join the discussion

by pbanavara » Wed Oct 15, 2008 11:25 pm
rohangupta83 wrote:
pbanavara wrote:It has to be proven that Gloria's argument is logical:
shouldn't we be proving that Roger's argument is flawed?
I don't think so because:

"would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical" : refute that her argument is illogical -> prove that her argument is logical
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Wed Oct 15, 2008 11:37 pm
that makes a lot of sense.
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:49 am
I also picked D.

The question asks to strenghten logic in Gloria's argument. But A strengthens the analogy between water and schools.

what do you think?
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:26 am
IMO D
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:30 am
ronniecoleman wrote:IMO D
Yes, baby. Nothing more to say?
Join the discussion

by ashley.com » Fri May 13, 2016 2:28 am
I also picked answer D
Join the discussion