Hi!
The question asks us to determine the accuracy of the study. Accordingly, the correct answer must be a fact that's directly related to the study itself, not the results.
This distinction is very important; we're not being asked to strengthen or weaken the study's conclusion - we're being asked about its methodology and accuracy.
Looking at the choices:
a) nothing about the study/participants
b) talks about participants - keep it alive for now
c) nothing about the study/participants
d) nothing about the study/participants
e) talks about participants - keep it alive for now
Now let's look at B and E in more detail:
B says that people who changed their diets didn't change another key factor that could lead to different grades. In terms of studies, this means that those students were a good control group. So, B does make us believe that the results were accurate.
Consider the opposite of B: students who changed their diet ALSO changed their study habits. If this were the case, then we'd be worried that the changed study habits impacted the study results, making those results less accurate.
E says that all the participants were in 1st or 2nd year. Does that have any impact on the study? Not unless we make a whole bunch of assumptions about college students, something we're not supposed to do on the GMAT. Since E requires outside information to be relevant, it must be outside of the scope.
Choose B!