BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

two small pronoun confusion

Expert replies
by cooldude » Sat Oct 07, 2006 5:40 am
we finally chose the cofee table towards the back of the store,which we thought would comlement our living room furniture


we finally chose the cofee table towards the back of the store,because we thought it would comlement our living room furniture


well can eomeone help me out here y statement 1 wrong and 2 correct?if i m not wrong then which is ambigous coz it may apply to store and table both rite?but y not it is ambiguous here?or is my logic faulty?someone plz clarify

###############################################################################

jim may not be elected CEO by the board because he does not meet ITS standard.

here it refers to board rite?but donn we generallt use it to refer to nonhuman things? :idea:
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by abby_g » Sun Oct 08, 2006 6:57 am
we finally chose the cofee table towards the back of the store,which we thought would comlement our living room furniture.

In the above sentence since which is close to store, it reads
the store would complement our living room furniture
. Hence incorrect.

I don't know the credibility of the second since i feel it is confusing at that place since the antecedent is not clear coffee table or store.
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:11 pm
"jim may not be elected CEO by the board because he does not meet ITS standard.

here it refers to board rite?but donn we generallt use it to refer to nonhuman things?"

I believe board , though comprising of humans is considered non-human.
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion

by nibake » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:01 pm
relative pronouns like that and which are somewhat restrictive with regard to their reference. They should refer to the noun phrase that comes before them, whereas personal pronouns like it and they are looser when it comes to reference.

In the original example (from Manhattan SC, right?) the pronoun which refers to the "back of the store" and the sentence is nonsensical.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1