BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

two of the tick marks

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:08 am
What is the least possible distance between any two of the tick marks on the number line segment from 0 to 1?

(1) The segment has been divided into fifths also, and indicated by the large tick marks.

(2) The segment has been divided into sevenths also, and indicated by the small tick marks.



[spoiler]MBM :wink:[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: two of the tick marks

by Vemuri » Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:01 am
I am sure there is a trick to answer this question. But, in just under 2 mins I can think of only D as my answer. I felt both the statements divided the line in equal lengths & so are sufficient independently.

Will wait for the answer & explanation :-)
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:48 am
This is Sanju's attempt to create a DS question from the PS question which says what is the min distance between any two tick marks on 1 unit long line which has marking for the fifth and also the seventh distances.
Good try Sanju, greatly appreciate it.

Now let me try this problem.

Stmt 1. If the line has been divided into fifths, then the least possible distance a fifth because the distance between any two marks is a fifth.
sufficient

stmt 2. same logic as before. answer is a 1/7. sufficient.


I dont see why it cant be D. In case the answer is not D, then the answer is C which is 1/35

Sanju, pls let know ur thoughts.

-V
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:31 am
It feels like I've been caught red-handed by vittal here :D He is right there, I have really translated a PS to DS, but not because of lack of thoughts or ideas. It's a mere improvisation indeed.

Well, that is said...

Now in my humble opinion, D can't be our choice as each statement uses the word 'also', which leaves more options open. Hence OA is not D for me at least! :)

Moreover, vittal, if C by any chance were correct alphabetically, then 1/35 is still not correct numerically. What do you think?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:13 am
sanju09 wrote:It feels like I've been caught red-handed by vittal here :D He is right there, I have really translated a PS to DS, but not because of lack of thoughts or ideas. It's a mere improvisation indeed.

Well, that is said...

Now in my humble opinion, D can't be our choice as each statement uses the word 'also', which leaves more options open. Hence OA is not D for me at least! :)

Moreover, vittal, if C by any chance were correct alphabetically, then 1/35 is still not correct numerically. What do you think?
Well Sanju!!. I dint pay much attention to "also".. my bad. then in that case each stmt is saying that there are markings of some "nths".
So answer is E coz we have no knowledge of "also" here.
Join the discussion