BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Two centuries ago, Tufe Peninsula became separated form the

Expert replies
by aspirant2011 » Sat May 14, 2011 4:47 am
Two centuries ago, Tufe Peninsula became separated form the mainland, isolating on the newly formed Tufe Island a population of Turfil sunflowers. This population's descendants grow to be, on average, 40 centimeters shorter than Turfil sunflowers found on the mainland. Tufe Island is significantly drier than Tufe Peninsula was. So the current average height of Tufe's Turfil sunflowers is undoubtedly at least partially attributable to changes in Tufe's environmental conditions. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. There are no types of vegetation on Tufe Island that are known to benefit from dry conditions.
B. There were about as many Turfil sunflowers on Tufe Peninsula two centuries ago as there are on Tufe Island today.
C. The mainland's environment has not changed in ways that have resulted in Turfil sunflowers on the mainland growing to be 40 centimeters taller than they did two centuries ago.
D. The soil on Tufe Island, unlike that on the mainland, lacks important nutrients that help Turfil sunflowers survive and grow tall in a dry environment.
E. The 40-centimeter height difference between the Turfil sunflowers on Tufe Island and those on the mainland is the only difference between the two populations.

[spoiler]OA: C vs D. Which one is better and why????[/spoiler]
Last edited by aspirant2011 on Sat May 14, 2011 7:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by HSPA » Sat May 14, 2011 5:07 am
I am with C
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sat May 14, 2011 7:26 am
HSPA, why is D wrong???????
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Sat May 14, 2011 7:33 pm
Option D is out of scope. Nuitrients are not part of discussion.

One more way:
Negate D:

Mainland and island have same nutrient content [after negating]
Does this help resolve this issue or does it weaken the conclusion?? NO
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by ajaarik » Sat May 14, 2011 8:55 pm
+1 C.

Reasons cited above.
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Mon May 16, 2011 7:29 am
HSPA wrote:Option D is out of scope. Nuitrients are not part of discussion.

One more way:
Negate D:

Mainland and island have same nutrient content [after negating]
Does this help resolve this issue or does it weaken the conclusion?? NO
If we negate C then it becomes "The mainland's environment has changed in ways that have resulted in Turfil sunflowers on the mainland growing to be 40 centimeters taller than they did two centuries ago. "............how does this weakens the conclusion?
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Mon May 16, 2011 7:38 am
aspirant2011 wrote:
HSPA wrote:Option D is out of scope. Nuitrients are not part of discussion.

One more way:
Negate D:

Mainland and island have same nutrient content [after negating]
Does this help resolve this issue or does it weaken the conclusion?? NO
If we negate C then it becomes "The mainland's environment has changed in ways that have resulted in Turfil sunflowers on the mainland growing to be 40 centimeters taller than they did two centuries ago. "............how does this weakens the conclusion?
Let the initial length before seperation be = Y cm
After seperation:
Mainland = Y, island = Y - 40

Negated C says after seperation: Mainland = Y+40 and island = Y...
this is a total weakener...because it not only weakens the data regarding moisture in island but also extrapolates the mainland's land nutrient levels.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by AIM GMAT » Tue May 17, 2011 5:39 am
IMO C

A. There are no types of vegetation on Tufe Island that are known to benefit from dry conditions. -- [Other types of vegetation , simply out of scope to discuss]

B. There were about as many Turfil sunflowers on Tufe Peninsula two centuries ago as there are on Tufe Island today. -- [Again how many sunflowers is irrelevant to discuss]

C. The mainland's environment has not changed in ways that have resulted in Turfil sunflowers on the mainland growing to be 40 centimeters taller than they did two centuries ago. -- [The argument is talking about the dry weather of island attributing to change in height so that means its is assumed that there is no change in the mainland climate thats why all the blame game is on little island :) ]

D. The soil on Tufe Island, unlike that on the mainland, lacks important nutrients that help Turfil sunflowers survive and grow tall in a dry environment. -- [Nutrients is not the factor that is to be discussed for the change in height only the climatic factor is in considertion as per the given argument]

E. The 40-centimeter height difference between the Turfil sunflowers on Tufe Island and those on the mainland is the only difference between the two populations. -- [Only diffrence ot not is not our concern , its already states that the height diffrenece is the change for which the argument evalutes the reason for being so .]
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Tue May 17, 2011 7:01 am
thanks to all of you guys :-)
Join the discussion

by cd86 » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:29 am
the conclusion says So the current average height of Tufe's Turfil sunflowers is undoubtedly at least partially attributable to changes in Tufe's environmental conditions

here i suppose Tufe's environmental conditions = (island+mainland)'s environmental consitions..so how does C serve to be an assumption on which the argument is based?

had the conclusion said attributable to changes in Tufe island 's environmental conditions..then C would make sense..right?[/u][/b]
Join the discussion

by richachampion » Sat Jul 15, 2017 11:30 pm
Did you study physics?
The concept of relative velocity: either my car is faster or your is slower.

The current plant on the peninsula is relatively shorter. so two possibilities:

1. either something changed so the plant on the mainland has grown taller as compared to its height 2 centuries back or
2. the plant on separated peninsula has grown shorter.


Option C is Point #1.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion