It's a bit technical here so, we must analyse the points one after the other in order to get the most suitable option.

Option - A - INCORRECT.
It sis true that it is important so as not to be caught in the web unnecessarily as such knowledge would only mean that you'd question whatever doesn't fall into that category. However, getting too serious about this genre of entertainment could take the beautiful and attractive scenes away from you (the best moment you don't want to miss). It's not justifiable to the reasoning in the write-up.

Option B - INCORRECT.
This is almost certain. It also shows the people are more aware of the system of criminal justice. Justice's appeals are within the fundamental right of the accused or convicted as the case may be. This does not justify the principles too.

Option C - INCORRECT.
Someone once said ''there's freedom of speech but i can't guarantee your freedom after speech'' in as much as the primary responsibility of such documentaries and podcasts is to entertain, it must also be known that information in the public domain serve as life teaching aid, model or say pattern to humans and must be within an informed perspective.

Option D - CORRECT.
Since the art is classified under make-beliefs it is certain to cause confusion in a way. However, one must avoid mixing the fun it presents with the orientation or message it's passing across. You can and should appreciate the work of art first before critiques. It is a valuable statement corroborating the author's position.

Option E - INCORRECT.
This is not right. Firstly, it may turn them to purveyors of fake news and secondly, they may provide inaccurate analysis of stories in a manner that suggests distortion.