BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tricky Parallelism

Expert replies
by tarina » Sun May 02, 2010 10:10 pm
1. Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-less than those killed by bee stings.
A movies-less than those
B movies-fewer than have been
C movies, which is less than those
D movies, a number lower than the people
E movies, fewer than the ones

OA E
Anyway, I'm gonna talk about the "have been" in option B. See another one,

2. A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.

A claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought

B claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought
C claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
D claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts
E claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts

OA A
Slightly different from Option C in term "have been".

Is such parallelism wrong?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by beat_gmat_09 » Sun May 02, 2010 10:32 pm
tarina wrote:1. Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-less than those killed by bee stings.
A movies-less than those
B movies-fewer than have been
C movies, which is less than those
D movies, a number lower than the people
E movies, fewer than the ones

OA E
Anyway, I'm gonna talk about the "have been" in option B. See another one,

2. A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.

A claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought

B claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought
C claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
D claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts
E claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts

OA A
Slightly different from Option C in term "have been".

Is such parallelism wrong?
I dont see any parallelism here (specif 2), parallel structures tested in GMAT are - either by listing series of things or comparing or contrasting dfferent things, generally nouns (position), verbs are words which are supposed to be parallel.
The second ques typically tests subject-verb-agree (option B), tenses (option C) modifier (option D and E)
only A is a good fit.

Do you have official explaintaion for parallelism ?
Join the discussion

by tarina » Sun May 02, 2010 10:53 pm
beat_gmat_09 wrote:
I dont see any parallelism here (specif 2), parallel structures tested in GMAT are - either by listing series of things or comparing or contrasting dfferent things, generally nouns (position), verbs are words which are supposed to be parallel.
The second ques typically tests subject-verb-agree (option B), tenses (option C) modifier (option D and E)
only A is a good fit.

Do you have official explaintaion for parallelism ?
To correct that, they're comparison rather than parallelism.
If you compare A with B, A and B must be of one type, whether they're nouns or verbs.

Let's have a look at Q1:
In Option B, "have been" killed by bee stings is compared with "have been" killed by the shark.
Yet, in option D there's nothing to compare with" have been"
Q2:
In option C, economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought. Comparison between two verbs---"be" and "have been".

Have I made myself clear?
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Sun May 02, 2010 11:00 pm
I got your point of comparisons and their parallelisms,
i doubt that gmat tests them on helping verbs (be,have), have never seen so far.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1