BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

tricky one: very complicated

Expert replies
by abhijeetsinghai » Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:49 am
This year the New Hampshire Division of Company X, set a new record for annual sales by that division. This record is especially surprising since the New Hampshire Division has the smallest potential market and the lowest sales of any of Company X’s divisions.
Which of the following identifies a flaw in the logical coherence of the statement above?
(A) If overall sales for Company X were sharply reduced, the New Hampshire Division’s new sales record is irrelevant to the company’s prosperity.
(B) Since the division is competing against its own record, the comparison of its sales record with that of other divisions is irrelevant.
(C) If this is the first year that the New Hampshire Division has been last in sales among Company X’s divisions, the new record is not surprising at all.
(D) If overall sales for Company X were greater than usual, it is not surprising that the New Hampshire Division was last in sales.
(E) Since the New Hampshire Division has the smallest potential market, it is not surprising that it had the lowest sales.

PLease help me. I am totally clueless on this one.
OA after some explanations
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by crossingfingers » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:00 am
IMO B...

(A) If overall sales for Company X were sharply reduced, the New Hampshire Division’s new sales record is irrelevant to the company’s prosperity. - irrelevant
(B) Since the division is competing against its own record, the comparison of its sales record with that of other divisions is irrelevant. - lets keep this
(C) If this is the first year that the New Hampshire Division has been last in sales among Company X’s divisions, the new record is not surprising at all. - huh? irrelevant
(D) If overall sales for Company X were greater than usual, it is not surprising that the New Hampshire Division was last in sales. - the suprise and flaw is about the record in that division - irrelevant
(E) Since the New Hampshire Division has the smallest potential market, it is not surprising that it had the lowest sales. - doesnt fix the flaw

I go with B since it says 'Since the division is competing against its own record'...it beat its own record, even though it had a the smallest potential market. So this record break has nothing to do with its lowest sales among other divisions.

OA please?
Join the discussion

by abhijeetsinghai » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:52 am
OA:[spoiler]B

[/spoiler]

But i don't understand what question is asking about. can any one please elaborate a bit ?
Join the discussion

Re: tricky one: very complicated

by Musicolo » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:58 am
I would go for B since.

Article talks about the new record of a certain division and states "this year the New Hampshire Division of Company X, set a new record for annual sales by that division". Then, it compares the record with all other divisions of the Company X, loosing it totally. If it said that this particular division set a new record for annual sales of all divisions of the Company X, then the statement would be logically coherent.
It isn't coherent as it is now since first sentence and second sentence talk about different things.
This is my understanding.
Join the discussion

by bmlaud » Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:36 am
IMO B

The hampshire division has registered highest ever sales (breaking its own previous sales records). It is illogical to conclude that hampshire division has registered highest sales among all the units.
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
Join the discussion

by Nailya » Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:56 pm
The division is competing against itself (as the argument says "by that division"). Even if it broke it's own record this time, it can still continue to be the lowest among other divisions. B!
Join the discussion

by lokeshg98 » Sun Aug 23, 2009 8:22 am
the first statement compares "New Hampshire Division" performance in the current year with the performance in the previous years.

In the second statement, Author expresses surprise by saying that "new hampshiree division" have the lowest mnarket share and lowest sales. so the author is comparing the sales/market shares of this division with other division - which is irrelevant.

So Answer B is correct
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sun Aug 23, 2009 8:51 am
"this year the New Hampshire Division of Company X, set a new record for annual sales by that division".
In this argument ,the eye catcher is"by that division".If one misses it by oversight,then it would be tough to decode it..
Join the discussion

by sanp_l » Sun Aug 23, 2009 9:04 am
The question asks for a logical coherence flaw.
the given premises are that of low sales across divisions which is not necessary as the sales are higher than what it had previosly. Obviously the comparison with other divisons are of no use.
hence Option B stands correct.
Sandy
Join the discussion

by ranell » Sun Aug 23, 2009 4:49 pm
IMO B, the best choice among all the answers
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 3:50 pm
B seems to be the best choice here
Join the discussion