BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tricky DS - How to solve Company, Divison x Division y

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by moneyman » Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:55 am
Well here is my approach,

The question says that all of the employees either belong to Div X or Div Y.

(1) gives the required answer.SUFFICIENT.

(2) says that more than half of full time employees of X belong to Div X and more than half of part time emplyees of X belong to Div Y. This gives us the exact information we are looking for.

To understand this better lets take an example

Lets assume company X has 100 full time and 100 part time exployees.So the ration of company X is 1:1. According to (2) lets say 60 FT emplyees belong to X and 60 PT employees belong to Y.The question says that all employees either belong to X or Y.So if there are 60 FT emps in X, there would be 40 FT emps in Y.Similarly, if there are 60 PT emps in Y then there would be 40 PT emps in X.This way we can find out the ratio for Division X.Hence SUFFICIENT.


Do you get me??
Maxx
Join the discussion

Here is another approach....

by silivest60 » Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:37 pm
I found this problem solved on a website (I don't remember what website though) some time ago....I think it's a very straightforward approach. Here it goes:

Let denote:
f1 = number of FT employee for div X
p1 = number of PT employee for div X
f2 = number of FT employee for div Y
p2 = number of PT employee for div Y
Then: f=f1+f2 and p=p1+p2

We are asked to show that:
f1/p1 > (f1+ f2)/(p1 + p2)
develop this inequation and we get:
f1p2 > f2p1

Stat.1 says: f2/p2 less then (f1+f2) divided by (p1+p2), develop it and we get f1p2 > f2p1 => stat.1 sufficient

stat.2 says: f1>f2 & p2>p1, multiply these two inequalities and you'll get:
f1p2 > f2p1 => stat.2 is sufficient

Ans. is D

Is that simple, or what??
Join the discussion

by aimhigh715 » Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:59 pm
thanks silivest60!
Work Hard, Play Harder!
Join the discussion

Re: Here is another approach....

by 4meonly » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:25 am
silivest60 wrote: stat.2 says: f1>f2 & p2>p1, multiply these two inequalities and you'll get:
f1p2 > f2p1 => stat.2 is sufficient
Can anybody elaborate?
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:01 am
ANYBODY?
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:14 am
4meonly wrote:ANYBODY?
In this equation,

since we know all the numbers are positive...
since employees are offcourse in positive.
let's say
3>2 and 5>4
offcourse 15>8 that's what is done here.

Hope it clears the confusion. Also, it can't be fractions.... only positive integers....
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:16 am
one more thing to add.....
as long as the variables on both sides in inequalities are positive, we can treat them same as equations.
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion