BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

tricky data sufficiency problem!!

Expert replies
by \'manpreet singh » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:15 am
Require some help here,i think the answer is (E)...BUT NOT CONFIDENT ON it.

If each customer purchases exactly 1 copy of the book, did the book sell at least 500 copies overall on the online book selling portal XYZ?

(1) The portal XYZ found that after selling 5 copies on a particular day, the percentage of customers who ultimately buy the book after viewing it increased from 46% to 47%.

(2) On a particular day, the portal XYZ found that 10 consecutive customers who viewed the item purchase some other book and the percentage dipped from 47% to 46%.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jim@StratusPrep » Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:02 pm
The answer is E. This is a very poorly written question, in all honesty.

Generally though:

1) Does not tell you how many days of data they have. 1 or 1,000 would make the difference.
2) This does not relate to purchases of the book in question at all.

Since 2 is not helpful at all and 1 was insufficient, the answer is E.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image
Join the discussion

by jcnasia » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:16 pm
I think the answer is E also, but for different reasons. I might be over thinking the problem. Would appreciate feedback.

Statement 1: From this statement, I can gather that they have enough data from enough days to say the following...
First, there's been enough less-than-5-book-days to give a percentage of customers who ultimately buy the book after viewing of 46%.
Second, similarly, there's been enough more-than-5-book days to give a percentage of 47%.
Third, the company has rounded, so we can say more accurately...

x = books bought during less-than-5-book-days
c = customers views
45.5% <= x/c < 46.5%
.455c <= x and x < .465c

y = books bought during more-than-(or equal to)-5-book-days
d = customer views
46.5% <= y/d < 47.5%
.465d <= y < .475d

In addition, x, y, c, d are all whole numbers.
The smallest that x can be is 6 (with c = 13), and the smallest that y can be is 7 (with d = 15).
So, we know the company sold at least 13 books based on statement 1, but they could have sold a lot more as well. We can hope that they are basing their data off more than 13 books sales, but we can't know. Statement 1 is insufficient by itself.

Statement 2: From this statement, I gather the following...

c = initial customers
b = books sales
b/c = 47%
b/(c+10) = 46%

But since, the company rounded, we can more accurately say...
46.5% <= b/c < 47.5%
45.5% <= b(c+10) < 46.5%

Solving for b...
.465c <= b and b < .475c
.455c + 4.55 <= b and b < .465c + 4.65

And since, b and c must be whole numbers...
...(using a spreadsheet to check values of c, starting at 1)...
...the smallest possible value of b is 112 (with c = 236 and c + 10 = 246).

So, we know that they sold at least 112 books on one particular day, but we don't know anything else about any other days, so this is insufficient by itself.

Statement 1 and 2:
Assuming that the company sold 112 books in one day with 46% conversion rate, how many books did they have to sale on other days, to make their more-than-(or equal to)-five-book-day average 47%?

Let y = books bought during more-than-5-book days (excluding the 112-book-sale day)
Let d = customer views (excluding the 246 views on the 112-book-sale day)

46.5% <= (y + 112)/(d + 246) < 47.5%
.465(d +246) - 112 <= y and y < .475(d + 246) - 112
And d >= y (since the company can't sell more than 1 book to a single customer)

A single day of 5 customer views and 5 book sales satisfy the above equations and raise the conversion rate to 46.6%.

So, we can conclude that at the very least the company sold...
6 books--we know they sold at least 6 books during their less-than-5-book-days based on statement 1.
112 books--we know they sold at least 112 books on one day based on Statement 2.
5 books--We know they had at least one more 5-book-day based on Statement 1 and 2 combined.
6 + 112 + 5 = 123

So, Statement 1 and 2 are insufficient.
Join the discussion

by dhonu121 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:50 am
If each customer purchases exactly 1 copy of the book, did the book sell at least 500 copies overall on the online book selling portal XYZ?

(1) The portal XYZ found that after selling 5 copies on a particular day, the percentage of customers who ultimately buy the book after viewing it increased from 46% to 47%.

(2) On a particular day, the portal XYZ found that 10 consecutive customers who viewed the item purchase some other book and the percentage dipped from 47% to 46%.
I am not able to answer this from either or combined. Would go with E.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion

by \'manpreet singh » Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:57 am
Thanks everyone for conforming on my answer.
Yes Jim i too believe the question is not well constructed ,i had the same feeling when i saw it so decided to post it.
Join the discussion