BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tricky Cr!!!

Expert replies
by Ozlemg » Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:02 am
Citizen: Each year since 1970, a new record has been set for the number of murders committed in this city. This fact points to the decreasing ability of our law enforcement system to prevent violent crime.

City Official: You overlook the fact that the city's population has risen steadily since 1970. In fact, the number of murder victims per 100 people has actually fallen slightly in the city since 1970.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strongly counter the city official's response?

A) The incidence of fraud has greatly increased in the city since 1970.

B) The rate of murders in the city since 1970 decreased according to the age group of the victim, decreasing more for younger victims.

C) Murders and other violent crimes are more likely to be reported now than they were in 1970.

D) The number of law enforcement officials in the city has increased at a rate judged by city law enforcement experts to be sufficient to serve the city's increased population.

E) If the health care received by assault victims last year had been of the same quality as it was in 1970, the murder rate in the city last year would have turned out to be several times what it actually was.


OA E
Last edited by Ozlemg on Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by blackjack » Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:18 am
E? What say?
Join the discussion

by jainnikhil02 » Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:43 am
IMO C
Nikhil K Jain
____________________

"Life is all about timing" Don't waste your and others time.
Join the discussion

by Ozlemg » Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:18 am
it is not C!!
That's why it is tricky :S
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion

by knight247 » Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:58 pm
E seems most obvious. C is definitely a contender but not stronger than E.
Join the discussion

by sanabk » Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:40 pm
Join the discussion

by David@VeritasPrep » Tue Jul 12, 2011 5:28 pm
Perhaps it is fate!!

This question was just discussed by Brian Galvin in the following article.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2011/07/ ... strategies

This should help...
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:18 am
between C and E,

C is actually strengthening officials argument,meaning as more incidents are reported,hence the decrease in the number actually shows that crime has reduced.

E is the only one befitting.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion

by coderversion1 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 5:50 am
So,
Citizen is saying murders are going up in number. Hence law enforcement system is unable to prevent crime.
City Official rejects it by sating they have decreased.

Question: Counter City Official's remark, (Hence prove crime has gone up > Hence law enforcement system is unable to prevent crime.)

Lets prephrase: 1. There might be a decrease in reporting if murders which will 'most strongly counter city official's response'.

Let's see each answer choice:

A. No relevance of 'incidence of frauds'. Neither Citizen nor city official discussed it.

B. This discusses a decrease in murders, so rather supports the city official's claim.

C. Murders and crimes are more likely to be reported now, if reporting is more, it strengthens the fact that data collected is more accurate. Hence what city official says is even more strengthened, also it is opposite of our prephrase. Hence Reject.

D. If law enforcement officials have increased, crime prevention should become more effective, supports city official's claim, if at all.

E. Now, Health care is able to convert murdered people to people alive (Intentional humor, but very straight point) If this is happening although murders have decreased, crimes have not which have increased --> ('murder rate in the city last year would have turned out to be several times what it actually was.'), hence this rejects city official's claim completely. Strong contender answer.

IMO and most definitely answer should be [spoiler] (E)[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:25 am
Dear members.. Kindly ignore C.. it is an opposite answer.. it gives support to the offical's words
amit2k9 wrote:between C and E,

C is actually strengthening officials argument,meaning as more incidents are reported,hence the decrease in the number actually shows that crime has reduced.

E is the only one befitting.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by artistocrat » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:50 pm
E cites an alternate cause to weaken official's cause.
Join the discussion