BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tricky CR- Experts!

Expert replies
by bryan88 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:08 am
Joshua: It is cause for alarm that over half of the people in this state reported in a survey that they knew someone who had been a victim of a crime.

Laura: But each person surveyed probably knows a hundred people. If only one person out of one hundred acquaintances had been a victim of a crime, even a petty theft, they would reply in the affirmative. Although a zero crime rate is ideal, it is unrealistic to expect the crime rate to be less than one percent.

Laura's argument relies on the assumption that

A)the crime rate rarely goes above one percent.
B)Joshua is accurately reporting the statistics he presents.
C)the number of people who know someone who is a victim of crime is always higher than fifty percent of the population.
D)awareness of a crime committed against an acquaintance generates more fear than does knowledge of crime statistics.
E)normally, crime victims are not found only in certain areas of the state among certain isolated groups of people.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by killer1387 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:30 am
Laura: But each person surveyed probably knows a hundred people. If only one person out of one hundred acquaintances had been a victim of a crime, even a petty theft, they would reply in the affirmative. Although a zero crime rate is ideal, it is unrealistic to expect the crime rate to be less than one percent.

E)normally, crime victims are not found only in certain areas of the state among certain isolated groups of people.

Its E then only Laura's argument stands.
Join the discussion

by GMAT Kolaveri » Sun Apr 01, 2012 5:30 am
bryan88 wrote:Joshua: It is cause for alarm that over half of the people in this state reported in a survey that they knew someone who had been a victim of a crime.

Laura: But each person surveyed probably knows a hundred people. If only one person out of one hundred acquaintances had been a victim of a crime, even a petty theft, they would reply in the affirmative. Although a zero crime rate is ideal, it is unrealistic to expect the crime rate to be less than one percent.

Laura's argument relies on the assumption that

A)the crime rate rarely goes above one percent.
B)Joshua is accurately reporting the statistics he presents.
C)the number of people who know someone who is a victim of crime is always higher than fifty percent of the population.
D)awareness of a crime committed against an acquaintance generates more fear than does knowledge of crime statistics.
E)normally, crime victims are not found only in certain areas of the state among certain isolated groups of people.
Negate E option --> Laura's argument cannot be true.
Hence E is the right answer.

To negate just prefix "It is not true that..."
Regards and Thanks,
Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
https://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/

Click the thank you button if you like my reply :)
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:50 am
bryan88 wrote:Joshua: It is cause for alarm that over half of the people in this state reported in a survey that they knew someone who had been a victim of a crime.

Laura: But each person surveyed probably knows a hundred people. If only one person out of one hundred acquaintances had been a victim of a crime, even a petty theft, they would reply in the affirmative. Although a zero crime rate is ideal, it is unrealistic to expect the crime rate to be less than one percent.

Laura's argument relies on the assumption that

A)the crime rate rarely goes above one percent.
B)Joshua is accurately reporting the statistics he presents.
C)the number of people who know someone who is a victim of crime is always higher than fifty percent of the population.
D)awareness of a crime committed against an acquaintance generates more fear than does knowledge of crime statistics.
E)normally, crime victims are not found only in certain areas of the state among certain isolated groups of people.
A--The actual crime rate is irrelevant to her argument; she's only arguing against Joshua's position
B--This would not affect the validity of her argument
C--The "higher than 50%" statement was part of Joshua's argument, so it has no bearing on Laura's response
D--Fear was not part of the argument
E--Bingo. Laura's argument only works if crime victims have many acquaintances. If this is not true, her argument falls apart.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion