BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Trains A and B - MGMAT

Expert replies
by pkw209 » Fri Apr 30, 2010 12:53 pm
Trains A and B travel at the same constant rate in opposite directions along the same route between Town G and Town H. If, after traveling for 2 hours, Train A passes Train B, how long does it take Train B to travel the entire distance between Town G and Town H?

(1) Train B started traveling between Town G and Town H 1 hour after Train A started traveling between Town H and Town G.

(2) Train B travels at the rate of 150 miles per hour.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by rn4gmat » Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:44 pm
IMO the answer to this would be E as from both the statements the required distance cannot be derived till we have the speed associated with train A given.

Hope this helps.
Join the discussion

by pkw209 » Mon May 03, 2010 4:05 pm
Unfortunately, that is not the correct answer.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon May 03, 2010 4:29 pm
pkw209 wrote:Trains A and B travel at the same constant rate in opposite directions along the same route between Town G and Town H. If, after traveling for 2 hours, Train A passes Train B, how long does it take Train B to travel the entire distance between Town G and Town H?

(1) Train B started traveling between Town G and Town H 1 hour after Train A started traveling between Town H and Town G.

(2) Train B travels at the rate of 150 miles per hour.
Here's the key piece of info in the stem (which I missed at first too!):

Trains A and B travel at the same constant rate...

So, we know that rate(a) = rate(b). We also know that they meet 2 hours after A starts.

From (2) we have rate(b) but no info about distance.. insufficient.

From (1) we know that A traveled 1 hour longer than B when they met. Since A has been traveling for 2 hours, B must have been traveling for 1 hour.

Well, A and B travel at the same rate. Since it took a combined 3 hours of work to meet (2 hours by A, 1 hour by B), it would also take either train 3 hours of alone time to make the full journey: 1 is sufficient alone, choose (A).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by pkw209 » Mon May 03, 2010 4:40 pm
The official answer is A. This problem is from a MGMAT CAT. Explanation is below.

(1) SUFFICIENT: This tells us that B started traveling 1 hour after Train A started traveling. From the question we know that Train A had been traveling for 2 hours when the trains passed each other. Thus, train B, which started 1 hour later, must have been traveling for 2 - 1 = 1 hour when the trains passed each other.

Let's call the point at which the two trains pass each other Point P. Train A travels from Town H to Point P in 2 hours, while Train B travels from Town G to Point P in 1 hour. Adding up these distances and times, we have it that the two trains covered the entire distance between the towns in 3 (i.e. 2 + 1) hours of combined travel time. Since both trains travel at the same rate, it will take 3 hours for either train to cover the entire distance alone. Thus, from Statement (1) we know that it will take Train B 3 hours to travel between Town G and Town H.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon May 03, 2010 5:43 pm
pkw209 wrote:The official answer is A. This problem is from a MGMAT CAT. Explanation is below.

(1) SUFFICIENT: This tells us that B started traveling 1 hour after Train A started traveling. From the question we know that Train A had been traveling for 2 hours when the trains passed each other. Thus, train B, which started 1 hour later, must have been traveling for 2 - 1 = 1 hour when the trains passed each other.

Let's call the point at which the two trains pass each other Point P. Train A travels from Town H to Point P in 2 hours, while Train B travels from Town G to Point P in 1 hour. Adding up these distances and times, we have it that the two trains covered the entire distance between the towns in 3 (i.e. 2 + 1) hours of combined travel time. Since both trains travel at the same rate, it will take 3 hours for either train to cover the entire distance alone. Thus, from Statement (1) we know that it will take Train B 3 hours to travel between Town G and Town H.
That's what I said!

:D
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by ssuarezo » Wed May 05, 2010 10:40 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
pkw209 wrote:The official answer is A. This problem is from a MGMAT CAT. Explanation is below.

(1) SUFFICIENT: This tells us that B started traveling 1 hour after Train A started traveling. From the question we know that Train A had been traveling for 2 hours when the trains passed each other. Thus, train B, which started 1 hour later, must have been traveling for 2 - 1 = 1 hour when the trains passed each other.
That's what I said!

:D
Yes Stuart ! .. exactly your words ... they've copied you ...

My problem I think is reading comprehension ( as strange as it may sound)
See:
a- If they travel in opposite directions, how could one pass another?
b- When they say "along the same route between Town G and Town H", does it mean from G to H? leaves G for H? both going to the same place? in opposite directions?

In your scenario, the explanation is clear, but how can I solve this kind of problems when dealing with reading-comprehension data sufficiency?

Thanks for your patience.
Silvia,
Join the discussion