BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

traffic

Expert replies
by ketkoag » Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:59 am
A certain mayor has proposed a fee of five dollars per day on private vehicles entering the city, claiming that the fee will alleviate the city’s traffic congestion. The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch from using their cars to using the bus.
Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor’s reasoning is flawed?
(A) Projected increases in the price of gasoline will increase the cost of taking a private vehicle into the city.
(B) The cost of parking fees already makes it considerably more expensive for most people to take a private vehicle into the city than to take a bus.
(C) Most of the people currently riding the bus do not own private vehicles.
(D) Many commuters opposing the mayor’s plan have indicated that they would rather endure traffic congestion than pay a five-dollar-per day fee.
(E) During the average workday, private vehicles owned and operated by people living within the city account for twenty percent of the city’s traffic congestion

what's wrong with E.. if the private vehicles are only 20 percent then the plan will not work in reducing the traffic congestion.
please elaborate..
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: traffic

by Vemuri » Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:43 am
IMO B. The cost of parking fees is already so high to discourage private vehicles into the the city than to take a bus. Applying a $5 per day fee is not going to make much of a difference.

E looked attractive when I first glanced at the answer choices, but if you look at it closely, it says that the 20% of city traffic congestion is contributed by people living within the city, not by people entering the city.

I hope B is the OA.
Join the discussion

by sudeep_ar » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:41 am
Definitely B..
As explained by vemuri
Join the discussion

by gmatstud » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:10 am
IMO also B.
Join the discussion

Re: traffic

by ketkoag » Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:14 am
Vemuri wrote:IMO B. The cost of parking fees is already so high to discourage private vehicles into the the city than to take a bus. Applying a $5 per day fee is not going to make much of a difference.

E looked attractive when I first glanced at the answer choices, but if you look at it closely, it says that the 20% of city traffic congestion is contributed by people living within the city, not by people entering the city.

I hope B is the OA.
OMG, how could i miss that!!!!! thanks vemuri for pointing it out.
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 2:44 pm
In my opinion B is the most logical one
Join the discussion