BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

traffic congestion

Expert replies
by thephoenix » Sun May 09, 2010 10:24 pm
Eva: A "smart highway" system should be installed, one that would monitor areawide traffic patterns and communicate with computers in vehicles or with programmable highway signs to give drivers information about traffic congestion and alternate routes. Such a system, we can infer, would result in improved traffic flow in and around cities that would do more than improve drivers' tempers; it would decrease the considerable loss of money and productivity that now results from traffic congestion.
Luis: There are already traffic reports on the radio. Why would a "smart highway" system be any better?

Eva's argument depends on the assumption that

(A) on "smart highways" there would not be the breakdowns of vehicles that currently cause traffic congestion
(B) traffic lights, if coordinated by the system, would assure a free flow of traffic
(C) traffic flow in and around cities is not now so congested that significant improvement is impossible
(D) the type of equipment used in "smart highway" systems would vary from one city to another
(E) older vehicles could not be fitted with equipment to receive signals sent by a "smart highway" system
OA to follow soon
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vishalkc2 » Sun May 09, 2010 11:03 pm
thephoenix wrote:Eva: A "smart highway" system should be installed, one that would monitor areawide traffic patterns and communicate with computers in vehicles or with programmable highway signs to give drivers information about traffic congestion and alternate routes. Such a system, we can infer, would result in improved traffic flow in and around cities that would do more than improve drivers' tempers; it would decrease the considerable loss of money and productivity that now results from traffic congestion.
Luis: There are already traffic reports on the radio. Why would a "smart highway" system be any better?

Eva's argument depends on the assumption that

(A) on "smart highways" there would not be the breakdowns of vehicles that currently cause traffic congestion
(B) traffic lights, if coordinated by the system, would assure a free flow of traffic
(C) traffic flow in and around cities is not now so congested that significant improvement is impossible
(D) the type of equipment used in "smart highway" systems would vary from one city to another
(E) older vehicles could not be fitted with equipment to receive signals sent by a "smart highway" system
OA to follow soon
IMO: C
Conclusion: Improved traffic flow is possible if "smarty highway" system is installed
Assumption: Depends only on Eva's argument. So Eva is assuming that improvements in traffic flow is feasible.
Join the discussion

by amitverma22 » Mon May 10, 2010 1:35 am
IMO ans is B

Luis is arguing for radio system where as Eva is arguing for smart system.
Eva argument is better than Luis only if smart system is doing something which is better than radio system.

And I think B indicates clear cut advantage of smart system
Join the discussion

by gsinghal » Mon May 10, 2010 7:34 am
IMO C. It states that there is still a possibility of improvement and that is what the option C is referring to. Look at the Luis's point : Why would a “smart highway� system be any better.

Wats tha OA?
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 am
OA is C
thanks to all for the help , but i was looking for y B is incorrect
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Mon May 10, 2010 8:50 pm
'C' seems to have another assumption that even if the improvement is not significant, considerable loss of money could be avoided. Could somebody throw more light on this?
Join the discussion

by ThiMBA » Tue May 11, 2010 5:29 am
I ruled out B because it made reference to traffic lights and at no point during Eva's argument did she make specific mention of traffic lights (only computers and programmable highway signs)

hope this helps
Join the discussion

by jeffedwards » Tue May 11, 2010 3:36 pm
The phoenix -

The same as ThiMBA - I ruled out B, because it was too specific. The assumption does not depend on this. There could be an alternate system to improve the situation such as something that could "communicate with computers in vehicles" and so on...

Paddle_sweep

The argument is that people could be rerouted. C is saying that the other streets are not overly congested...so rerouting would work. If the alternate routes were also congested then traffic wouldn't see a significant improvement by rerouting. Does that make sense?
Join the discussion