BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

tough tough SC modifiers Q

Expert replies
by san2009 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:40 am
What, if anything, is wrong with this sentence?

Many antibiotics can become ineffective if administered repeatedly to members of a population, and one reason is suggested by the finding that there are bacteria with special enzymes that can deactivate certain antibiotics in all countries but those that have reported that they have had limited access to these drugs.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by uwhusky » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:54 am
I believe it's a run-on sentence.

Many antibiotics can become ineffective if administered repeatedly to members of a population, and one reason is suggested by the finding that there are bacteria with special enzymes that can deactivate certain antibiotics in all countries but those that have reported that they have had limited access to these drugs.

"if administered repeatedly to members of a population" is an adverb, so it can be removed from the main clause. So the bold part is what the main clause appears to be, and I don't think they should be combined together with conjunction "and".
Yep.
Join the discussion

by san2009 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:02 am
thats what i thought
but its actually correct
i can't get my head around ", and one " part of the sentence
source is knewton
instructors pls help!
Join the discussion

by selango » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:18 am
If "and" is not used it ll become the runon sentence.
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by san2009 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:27 am
", and one reason is suggested" is correct?

shouldn't there be a "that" in there?
Join the discussion

by gmat_perfect » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:34 pm
san2009 wrote:What, if anything, is wrong with this sentence?

Many antibiotics can become ineffective if administered repeatedly to members of a population, and one reason is suggested by the finding that there are bacteria with special enzymes that can deactivate certain antibiotics in all countries but those that have reported that they have had limited access to these drugs.
I think the sentence is okay in the way as it is.

Many antibiotics can become ineffective if [they are]administered repeatedly to members of a population, and one reason is suggested by the finding that there are bacteria with special enzymes that can deactivate certain antibiotics in all countries but those that have reported that they have had limited access to these drugs

Think about another sentence:

Although eradicated in the United States, polio continues elsewhere and could be brought...

=> Here, Although [it is ] eradicated in the USA, polio.

In the same way the sentence is correct.

Again:

Independent clause + COMMA + FANBOYS + Independent clause is correct.


We can wait for a reply from the instructors.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:17 pm
gmat_perfect wrote: Think about another sentence:

Although eradicated in the United States, polio continues elsewhere and could be brought...

=> Here, Although [it is ] eradicated in the USA, polio.

In the same way the sentence is correct.

Again:

Independent clause + COMMA + FANBOYS + Independent clause is correct.


We can wait for a reply from the instructors.
"Although eradicated in the United States" is NOT an independent clause. It lacks subject. It's actually a modifier, and not the same parallel example to question at hand.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by gmat_perfect » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:29 pm
uwhusky wrote:
gmat_perfect wrote: Think about another sentence:

Although eradicated in the United States, polio continues elsewhere and could be brought...

=> Here, Although [it is ] eradicated in the USA, polio.

In the same way the sentence is correct.

Again:

Independent clause + COMMA + FANBOYS + Independent clause is correct.


We can wait for a reply from the instructors.
"Although eradicated in the United States" is NOT an independent clause. It lacks subject. It's actually a modifier, and not the same parallel example to question at hand.
One thing:

I did not say that "although eradicated..." is an IC. I have just shown that "although eradicated"---> Although it is eradicated, and the same thing has been applied in the said sentence.

I have seen this pattern in NewYork Times and in Washington Post.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1