BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Today's Tennis rackets

Expert replies
by winnerhere » Wed Jun 01, 2011 10:16 am
Today's tennis rackets, which come in a bewildering array of sizes, materials and prices, may not have improved players' games as much as they have boosted dealers' and manufacturers' profits.

a)may not have improved players' games as much as they have boosted
b)may not have improved a player's game as much as they have boosted
c)may not have improved a player's game as much as it has boosted
d)may not have caused improvements for players' games as much as they may have boosted
e)may not have done as much in improving players' games as in boosting
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by crh » Wed Jun 01, 2011 10:27 am
IMO B
Join the discussion

by Calvin123 » Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:11 am
winnerhere wrote:Today's tennis rackets, which come in a bewildering array of sizes, materials and prices, may not have improved players' games as much as they have boosted dealers' and manufacturers' profits.

a)may not have improved players' games as much as they have boosted
comparison is not parallel.
b)may not have improved a player's game as much as they have boosted
comparison is not parallel.
c)may not have improved a player's game as much as it has boosted
use of it is wrong.
d)may not have caused improvements for players' games as much as they may have boosted
awkward construction.
e)may not have done as much in improving players' games as in boosting
This sounds best to me.
Rackets have not done as much in improving ... as in boosting....

IMO E


IMO E
Join the discussion

by hardikm » Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:41 am
IMO A as we are comparing the amount of boost tennis rackets have provided.
b)may not have improved a player's game as much as they have boosted
Many rackets affects only one player's game....??
c)may not have improved a player's game as much as it has boosted
Pronoun Error
d)may not have caused improvements for players' games as much as they may have boosted
Wordy
e)may not have done as much in improving players' games as in boosting
Parallel but awkward.. doesnt sound right...

Bit confused between A and E
Join the discussion

by sanabk » Wed Jun 01, 2011 1:41 pm
E
Today's tennis rackets, which come in a bewildering array of sizes, materials and prices,, may not have done as much in improving players' games as in boosting dealers' and manufacturers' profits.

as much X as Y.

Best!!!
Join the discussion

by anujmalik » Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:30 pm
IMO B
Join the discussion

by winnerhere » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:58 pm
hardikm wrote:IMO A as we are comparing the amount of boost tennis rackets have provided.
b)may not have improved a player's game as much as they have boosted
Many rackets affects only one player's game....??
c)may not have improved a player's game as much as it has boosted
Pronoun Error
d)may not have caused improvements for players' games as much as they may have boosted
Wordy
e)may not have done as much in improving players' games as in boosting
Parallel but awkward.. doesnt sound right...

Bit confused between A and E
but a player ca be representative of th whole lot right? ...

I am not sure how these new books would help a reader....it is good.
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:03 pm
In A : "they" is confusing me.. I will opt it out.
B is okay
E is okay
I will say B > E as we are trying to say X is greater than Y. I also doubt rackets doing something.
Calvin123 wrote:
winnerhere wrote:Today's tennis rackets, which come in a bewildering array of sizes, materials and prices, may not have improved players' games as much as they have boosted dealers' and manufacturers' profits.

a)may not have improved players' games as much as they have boosted
comparison is not parallel.
b)may not have improved a player's game as much as they have boosted
comparison is not parallel.
c)may not have improved a player's game as much as it has boosted
use of it is wrong.
d)may not have caused improvements for players' games as much as they may have boosted
awkward construction.
e)may not have done as much in improving players' games as in boosting
This sounds best to me.
Rackets have not done as much in improving ... as in boosting....

IMO E


IMO E
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by aftableo2006 » Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:46 am
thankx for the explanation B is the correct answer
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1