BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Time and Work

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by harshavardhanc » Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:29 pm
eaakbari wrote:I always seem to mess time and work problems up. Any insight?
E,

I always like to use percentages in these sums/problems. I feel uncomfortable in working with fractions and hence, use percetances instead.

For e.g. if a problem says A can complete work in 10 days. B has twice A's efficiency. In how many days would the work be completed if they work together.

Instead of working with 1/10 and 1/5 , I see work done/day by A as 10% and work done/day by B as 20% and add these two, which gives me 30% of the work done in one day. Therefore, 100% can be completed in 10/3 days :)

a little practice would make it easier to tackle these problems.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:40 am
harshavardhanc wrote:
eaakbari wrote:I always seem to mess time and work problems up. Any insight?
E,

I always like to use percentages in these sums/problems. I feel uncomfortable in working with fractions and hence, use percetances instead.

For e.g. if a problem says A can complete work in 10 days. B has twice A's efficiency. In how many days would the work be completed if they work together.

Instead of working with 1/10 and 1/5 , I see work done/day by A as 10% and work done/day by B as 20% and add these two, which gives me 30% of the work done in one day. Therefore, 100% can be completed in 10/3 days :)

a little practice would make it easier to tackle these problems.
Hmmm, yes you definitely make it sound simpler, but that would only be for numbers like 5 and 10 right. Or do you use it for a number like 17 too.

Thanks a bunch
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:45 am
eaakbari wrote:
harshavardhanc wrote:
eaakbari wrote:I always seem to mess time and work problems up. Any insight?
E,

I always like to use percentages in these sums/problems. I feel uncomfortable in working with fractions and hence, use percetances instead.

For e.g. if a problem says A can complete work in 10 days. B has twice A's efficiency. In how many days would the work be completed if they work together.

Instead of working with 1/10 and 1/5 , I see work done/day by A as 10% and work done/day by B as 20% and add these two, which gives me 30% of the work done in one day. Therefore, 100% can be completed in 10/3 days :)

a little practice would make it easier to tackle these problems.
Hmmm, yes you definitely make it sound simpler, but that would only be for numbers like 5 and 10 right. Or do you use it for a number like 17 too.

Thanks a bunch
ha ha! you apple-picked the best number in this universe!! ;)

don't worry ! numbers like 17 and 19 won't appear in the questions of time and work till the 750 level :)

However, you may have to learn the reciprocals of numbers till 12. that is 8.33%.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:50 am
Haha , yes actually I did :wink:
Your post in Pipe leak (https://www.beatthegmat.com/pipe-leak-t55955.html) made me realize you do use percentages quite elegantly. I shall give the method a try.
Thanks, your a rockstar

E
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion