Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Time and Work

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic
Expert replies
by eaakbari » Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:29 pm
I always seem to mess time and work problems up. Any insight?
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by harshavardhanc » Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:29 pm
eaakbari wrote:I always seem to mess time and work problems up. Any insight?
E,

I always like to use percentages in these sums/problems. I feel uncomfortable in working with fractions and hence, use percetances instead.

For e.g. if a problem says A can complete work in 10 days. B has twice A's efficiency. In how many days would the work be completed if they work together.

Instead of working with 1/10 and 1/5 , I see work done/day by A as 10% and work done/day by B as 20% and add these two, which gives me 30% of the work done in one day. Therefore, 100% can be completed in 10/3 days :)

a little practice would make it easier to tackle these problems.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:40 am
harshavardhanc wrote:
eaakbari wrote:I always seem to mess time and work problems up. Any insight?
E,

I always like to use percentages in these sums/problems. I feel uncomfortable in working with fractions and hence, use percetances instead.

For e.g. if a problem says A can complete work in 10 days. B has twice A's efficiency. In how many days would the work be completed if they work together.

Instead of working with 1/10 and 1/5 , I see work done/day by A as 10% and work done/day by B as 20% and add these two, which gives me 30% of the work done in one day. Therefore, 100% can be completed in 10/3 days :)

a little practice would make it easier to tackle these problems.
Hmmm, yes you definitely make it sound simpler, but that would only be for numbers like 5 and 10 right. Or do you use it for a number like 17 too.

Thanks a bunch
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:45 am
eaakbari wrote:
harshavardhanc wrote:
eaakbari wrote:I always seem to mess time and work problems up. Any insight?
E,

I always like to use percentages in these sums/problems. I feel uncomfortable in working with fractions and hence, use percetances instead.

For e.g. if a problem says A can complete work in 10 days. B has twice A's efficiency. In how many days would the work be completed if they work together.

Instead of working with 1/10 and 1/5 , I see work done/day by A as 10% and work done/day by B as 20% and add these two, which gives me 30% of the work done in one day. Therefore, 100% can be completed in 10/3 days :)

a little practice would make it easier to tackle these problems.
Hmmm, yes you definitely make it sound simpler, but that would only be for numbers like 5 and 10 right. Or do you use it for a number like 17 too.

Thanks a bunch
ha ha! you apple-picked the best number in this universe!! ;)

don't worry ! numbers like 17 and 19 won't appear in the questions of time and work till the 750 level :)

However, you may have to learn the reciprocals of numbers till 12. that is 8.33%.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:50 am
Haha , yes actually I did :wink:
Your post in Pipe leak (https://www.beatthegmat.com/pipe-leak-t55955.html) made me realize you do use percentages quite elegantly. I shall give the method a try.
Thanks, your a rockstar

E
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion