BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tiger Attack

Expert replies
by snehit » Tue May 26, 2009 8:12 am
A decade after a logging operation in India began cutting down trees in a territory that serves as a sanctuary for Bengal tigers, the incidence of tigers attacking humans in nearby villages has increased by 300%. Because the logging operation has reduced the number of acres of woodland per tiger on average from 15 acres to approximately 12 acres, scientists have theorized that tigers must need a minimum number of acres of wood land in order to remain content.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most strengthen the scientists' hypothesis?

A] In other wildlifeareas in India where the number of acres of woodland per tigers remains at least 15 acres, there has been no increase in the number of tiger attacks on humans.

B] Before logging operation began, there were many fewer humans living in the area.

c] The largest number of acres per tiger before the logging operation began was 32 acres per tiger in one area of sactuary, whereas the smallest number of acres per tiger after the logging operation was 9 acres.

D] Other species of wild animals have begun competing with Bengal tigers for the dwindling food supply.

E] The bengal tiger has become competely extinct in other areas of Asia.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Tiger Attack

by amazonviper » Tue May 26, 2009 8:18 am
snehit wrote:A decade after a logging operation in India began cutting down trees in a territory that serves as a sanctuary for Bengal tigers, the incidence of tigers attacking humans in nearby villages has increased by 300%. Because the logging operation has reduced the number of acres of woodland per tiger on average from 15 acres to approximately 12 acres, scientists have theorized that tigers must need a minimum number of acres of wood land in order to remain content.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most strengthen the scientists' hypothesis?

A] In other wildlifeareas in India where the number of acres of woodland per tigers remains at least 15 acres, there has been no increase in the number of tiger attacks on humans.

B] Before logging operation began, there were many fewer humans living in the area.

c] The largest number of acres per tiger before the logging operation began was 32 acres per tiger in one area of sactuary, whereas the smallest number of acres per tiger after the logging operation was 9 acres.

D] Other species

IMO the SC content is as follows

Loss of Acres per tiger --> Increase attack rate (from the scientist's opinion).

So the only option that is strengthening the conclusion is option A.
Let me know the OA please. :-)
Join the discussion

Re: Tiger Attack

by vinaynp » Tue May 26, 2009 8:47 am
snehit wrote:A decade after a logging operation in India began cutting down trees in a territory that serves as a sanctuary for Bengal tigers, the incidence of tigers attacking humans in nearby villages has increased by 300%. Because the logging operation has reduced the number of acres of woodland per tiger on average from 15 acres to approximately 12 acres, scientists have theorized that tigers must need a minimum number of acres of wood land in order to remain content.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most strengthen the scientists' hypothesis?

A] In other wildlifeareas in India where the number of acres of woodland per tigers remains at least 15 acres, there has been no increase in the number of tiger attacks on humans.

B] Before logging operation began, there were many fewer humans living in the area.

c] The largest number of acres per tiger before the logging operation began was 32 acres per tiger in one area of sactuary, whereas the smallest number of acres per tiger after the logging operation was 9 acres.

D] Other species of wild animals have begun competing with Bengal tigers for the dwindling food supply.

E] The bengal tiger has become competely extinct in other areas of Asia.
A) It is the only one that strengthens the hypothesis.
Join the discussion

by caprion » Tue May 26, 2009 10:16 pm
IMO A

whats the OA
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Wed May 27, 2009 12:16 pm
IMO, A. Everything else seems very much out of scope or irrelevant.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by snehit » Thu May 28, 2009 9:41 pm
Yup. Correct answer is A only. Who answer A are correct
Join the discussion

by Musicolo » Fri May 29, 2009 1:48 am
easy one-A
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 3:00 pm
Option A looks good than other answers
Join the discussion