BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Three large companies and seven small ones.--Assumption

Expert replies
by amysky_0205 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 4:34 am
Three large companies and seven small companies currently manufacture a product with potential military applications. If the government regulates the industry, it will institute a single set of manufacturing specifications to which all ten companies will have to adhere. In this case, therefore, since none of the seven small companies can afford to convert their production lines to a new set of manufacturing specifications, only the three large companies will be able to remain in business.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the author's argument relies?

A. None of the three large companies will go out of business if the government does not regulate the manufacture of the product.
B. It would cost more to convert the production lines of the small companies to a new set of manufacturing specifications than it would to convert the production lines of the large companies.
C. Industry lobbyists will be unable to dissuade the government from regulating the industry.
D. Assembly of the product produced according to government manufacturing specifications would be more complex than current assembly procedures.
E. None of the seven small companies currently manufactures the product to a set of specifications that would match those the government would institute if the industry were to be regulated.

OA: E

can someone explain this in detail?
thank u!!!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by aman88 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:22 am
IMO E

Approach this question by finding out the evidence and the conclusion. Then prephrase an answer and check out the answer choices. Eliminate the irrelevant ones and then run a Negation test to find the right answer.

Evidence: Three large companies and seven small companies currently manufacture a product with potential military applications. If the government regulates the industry, it will institute a single set of manufacturing specifications to which all ten companies will have to adhere.

Conclusion: Since none of the seven small companies can afford to convert their production lines to a new set of manufacturing specifications, only the three large companies will be able to remain in business.

What links them together? An assumption, that, only large companies can afford to convert their production line. Or, only large companies currently manufacture products that match govt. specifications.

Now look at the answer choices. Only choice E talks about what we have prephrased above.

To check: Negate choice E.
Some of the seven small companies can afford to convert their production lines to a new set of manufacturing specifications, only the three large companies will be able to remain in business.

After negating choice E, the conclusion falls apart. Therefore, it must be right one.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by amysky_0205 » Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:47 am
aman88 wrote:IMO E

Approach this question by finding out the evidence and the conclusion. Then prephrase an answer and check out the answer choices. Eliminate the irrelevant ones and then run a Negation test to find the right answer.

Evidence: Three large companies and seven small companies currently manufacture a product with potential military applications. If the government regulates the industry, it will institute a single set of manufacturing specifications to which all ten companies will have to adhere.

Conclusion: Since none of the seven small companies can afford to convert their production lines to a new set of manufacturing specifications, only the three large companies will be able to remain in business.

What links them together? An assumption, that, only large companies can afford to convert their production line. Or, only large companies currently manufacture products that match govt. specifications.

Now look at the answer choices. Only choice E talks about what we have prephrased above.

To check: Negate choice E.
Some of the seven small companies can afford to convert their production lines to a new set of manufacturing specifications, only the three large companies will be able to remain in business.

After negating choice E, the conclusion falls apart. Therefore, it must be right one.

Thanks.

Ummm.... aman88 thank u for ur reply.

but the option E seems a little different in ur explanation.. tks
Join the discussion

by aman88 » Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:51 am
amysky_0205 wrote: Ummm.... aman88 thank u for ur reply.

but the option E seems a little different in ur explanation.. tks
Alright Amy, see, our prephrase is: Only large companies CAN afford to convert their production line. Or, only large companies currently manufacture products that match govt. specifications.

One can reword it and say, 'Small companies CANNOT afford to convert their production line. Or, small companies currently DO NOT manufacture products that match govt. specifications.'

The reworded sentence seems like choice E, right? Your prephrase might not always look exactly like the choices, and can differ person to person (because afterall it's a prephrase), but the intended meaning will and has to be the same (like in our prephrase).

I hope that answers your question.

Thanks.
Join the discussion