BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Those who feel that fewer and fewer

Expert replies
by aditya8062 » Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:30 am
Those who feel that fewer and fewer people in this country have a genuine interest in the fine arts are absolutely correct. This is true despite the oft-mentioned record levels of attendance at art museums.

The argument above would be most strengthened if which of the following statements were true ?

A- The increase in the number of people who visit art museums more than once has been greater than the increase in the number of visits of these museums.

B- An interest in the fine arts cannot be determined by examining levels of museum attendance.

C- A substantial and relatively consistent portion of the visitors to this country's art museums are, and always have been, international tourists.

D- Sales of art books have declined sharply.

E- Art museums in this country now display a much wider range of exhibits than was once the case.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:57 am
aditya8062 wrote:Those who feel that fewer and fewer people in this country have a genuine interest in the fine arts are absolutely correct. This is true despite the oft-mentioned record levels of attendance at art museums.

The argument above would be most strengthened if which of the following statements were true ?

A- The increase in the number of people who visit art museums more than once has been greater than the increase in the number of visits of these museums.

B- An interest in the fine arts cannot be determined by examining levels of museum attendance.

C- A substantial and relatively consistent portion of the visitors to this country's art museums are, and always have been, international tourists.

D- Sales of art books have declined sharply.

E- Art museums in this country now display a much wider range of exhibits than was once the case.
The premise is that there has been a RECORD LEVEL OF ATTENDANCE.
The conclusion is that FEWER PEOPLE HAVE A GENUINE INTEREST IN THE ARTS.

The passage links the RECORD LEVEL ATTENDANCE to FEWER PEOPLE with a genuine interest in the arts.
The correct answer must strengthen this link.

Answer choice A: The increase in the NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO VISIT MUSEUMS MORE THAN ONCE has been greater than the increase in the NUMBER OF VISITS to these museums.
The implication is that the RECORD LEVEL OF ATTENDANCE has been due NOT to an increase in the number of visitors but to an increase in the number of people who visit the museum MORE THAN ONCE.
The result:
While the number of VISITS has increased, the number of VISITORS likely has decreased, since the SAME VISITORS are coming to the museum over and over -- strengthening the conclusion that FEWER people have a genuine interest in the arts.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by ranjeet75 » Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 am
[quote="GMATGuruNY"][quote="aditya8062"]Those who feel that fewer and fewer people in this country have a genuine interest in the fine arts are absolutely correct. This is true despite the oft-mentioned record levels of attendance at art museums.

The argument above would be most strengthened if which of the following statements were true ?

A- The increase in the number of people who visit art museums more than once has been greater than the increase in the number of visits of these museums.

B- An interest in the fine arts cannot be determined by examining levels of museum attendance.

C- A substantial and relatively consistent portion of the visitors to this country's art museums are, and always have been, international tourists.

D- Sales of art books have declined sharply.

E- Art museums in this country now display a much wider range of exhibits than was once the case.[/quote]

The premise is that there has been a RECORD LEVEL OF ATTENDANCE.
The conclusion is that FEWER PEOPLE HAVE A GENUINE INTEREST IN THE ARTS.

The passage links the RECORD LEVEL ATTENDANCE to FEWER PEOPLE with a genuine interest in the arts.
The correct answer must strengthen this link.

Answer choice [spoiler]A[/spoiler]: [i]The increase in the NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO VISIT MUSEUMS MORE THAN ONCE has been greater than the increase in the NUMBER OF VISITS to these museums.[/i]
The implication is that the RECORD LEVEL OF ATTENDANCE has been due NOT to an increase in the number of visitors but to an increase in the number of people who visit the museum MORE THAN ONCE.
The result:
While the number of VISITS has increased, the number of VISITORS likely has decreased, since the SAME VISITORS are coming to the museum over and over -- strengthening the conclusion that FEWER people have a genuine interest in the arts.

The correct answer is [spoiler]A[/spoiler].[/quote]

[b]Why C is wrong? [/b][color=red][/color][size=18][/size]
Join the discussion

by beatthe800 » Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:52 pm
GMATGuruNY, I got A But C is also strong contender.Could you please explain why C is wrong.

c: A substantial and relatively consistent portion of the visitors to this country's art museums are, and always have been, international tourists.
=> This suggests visitors have always been international tourists and none or nil visitors from that country. Which also strengthen the conclusion.

Please let me know if I am making mistake somewhere.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:56 pm
beatthe800 wrote:GMATGuruNY, I got A But C is also strong contender.Could you please explain why C is wrong.

c: A substantial and relatively consistent portion of the visitors to this country's art museums are, and always have been, international tourists.
=> This suggests visitors have always been international tourists and none or nil visitors from that country. Which also strengthen the conclusion.

Please let me know if I am making mistake somewhere.
To make the situation clearer, let's plug in values.
Let the ratio of INTERNATIONAL TOURISTS to OTHER TYPES OF VISITORS = 2:3.
Let the original attendance = 100, implying that international tourists = 40 and other types of visitors = 60.
Let the RECORD LEVEL of attendance = 1000, implying that international tourists = 400 and other types of tourists = 600.
The result:
The number of other types of visitors INCREASES from 60 to 600, WEAKENING the conclusion that fewer and fewer people in this country have a genuine interest in the arts.
Since the correct answer choice must STRENGTHEN the conclusion, eliminate C.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Sun Apr 07, 2013 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by beatthe800 » Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:13 pm
Thanks GMATGuruNY.
I missed the vital point "relatively consistent portion of the visitors"

Very well explained.
Join the discussion