BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-ef

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Tue Mar 05, 2019 8:45 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects supposedly caused by a new vitamin supplement that was recently released onto the market. The new product has many advantages over its competitors such as the inclusion of antioxidants and iron, and the improvement of the absorption process of the vitamins into the body, to name a few. Clearly, the side-effects are not related to the new product and are simply coincidental.

The argument is flawed primarily because the author

A) assumes a correlation between the number of benefits provided by a particular product and its lack of drawbacks
B) does not make a clear comparison between the advantages of the new product and those of any one of its competitors
C) ignores the negative side-effects caused by the new product's competitors
D) fails to include the professional opinion of a medical expert in the field of nutritional science
E) draws a conclusion without presenting factual information that can be logically analyzed

OA A

Source: Economist Gmat
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Mar 17, 2019 6:50 am
OPTION A:- CORRECT
The primary flaw in this argument is the assumption that there is a relationship between the drug benefits and its side-effects. The argument assumes without proper investigation that because of the drugs and many benefits, the side effects are not related to the drug but just coincidental.

OPTION B:- INCORRECT
This doesn't serve as a flaw to the argument because the argument is more concerned about the new product than its competitors, so its completely normal if the advantages of competing drug is not mentioned or compared to that of the new product.

OPTION C:- INCORRECT
The argument isn't flawed by this because the complains made were concerning the new product not the competing drug, so its negative side effects is not needed in the argument.

OPTION D:- INCORRECT
Well, the argument lacks the opinion of a medical expert in the field of nutritional science, but it doesn't serve as a primary flaw to the argument, because the necessary advantages the drug provides has been made known.

OPTION E:- INCORRECT
The argument presented information we need to know about the new product and from which it drew its conclusion, so it isn't flawed due to this.
Join the discussion