BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The workers' association of the North Western Train Lines

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jul 17, 2019 4:10 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

The workers' association of the North Western Train Lines Co. has decided to declare a strike unless all its members receive an immediate salary raise of 15% percent. This did not deter the chairperson of the board, who was quoted saying: "The chances of a strike remain slim. This is the third time in as many years that the worker's association has threatened to go on strike if we don't increase their wages, yet we haven't had a strike on that matter in half a decade."
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the chairperson's conclusion?

a) A three day strike was held the year before last year after the chairperson refused to cancel a five percent pay cut following a warning by the workers' association that a strike would be inevitable.

b) Strikes are far more common in countries with large socialist parties than in capitalist countries such as the USA.

c) Unlike the last two years, in which the deliberation over the salary raise reached a stalemate, this year the governing board of the North Western Train Lines Co. decided to raise the salary throughout the organization by 5%.

d) Over the past three years, there has been an influx of 3% in the number of North Western Train Lines Co. employees.

e) Six years ago a strike was called over the board's refusal to raise the salaries by 10%.

OA C

Source: Economist Gmat
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Wed Jul 31, 2019 5:52 am
We need to find what agrees with the chairperson's conclusion.
Premise: The workers' association of the North-Western Train Lines Co. has decided to declare a strike unless all its members receive an immediate salary raise of 15%.
Conclusion: The chances of strike action remain slim.

Option A - Incorrect
This opposes the claim made by the chairperson that a strike hasn't taken place in about half a decade.

Option B - Incorrect
we are not concerned about the locations with more strike actions or not.

Option C - Correct
This supports the chairperson's conclusion because if the salary of the worker is raised by 5%, it reduces the chances of strike action.

Option D - Incorrect
This doesn't explain why the chances of strike action this time around are slim

Option E - Incorrect
If true, then this doesn't support the chairperson's conclusion because it cannot explain why the chances of strike action are slim.
Join the discussion