BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The USDA

Expert replies
by reply2spg » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:22 pm
Source - Grockit

The USDA prohibits food manufacturers from labeling foods as 'organic' if the foods conttain antibiotics, hormones, pesticides, irradiation or genetic modification

pesticides, irradiation or genetic modification

pesticides, irradiation or anything that has been genetically modified

and pesticides, or if they have been irradiated or genetically modified

or pesticides, or if they have been irradiated or genetically modified

or pesticides, and anything that has been irradiated or genetically modified

OA later
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by this_time_i_will » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:37 pm
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:44 pm
Why not E?

Btw...just saw your blog. Liked the caption 'once the game is over the king and the pawn go back into the same' :)
this_time_i_will wrote:should be D
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by hitmis » Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:12 pm
imo D

E would be right if it mant to say that the food contained either antibiotics, hormones or pesticides and in addition the food was irradiated or genetically modified.

Here it means to say its or of all clause and no ands anywhere.

Almost reminds me of Venn diagrams, :)

Whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:25 pm
OA is indeed D
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:32 am
hitmis wrote:imo D

E would be right if it mant to say that the food contained either antibiotics, hormones or pesticides and in addition the food was irradiated or genetically modified.

Here it means to say its or of all clause and no ands anywhere.

Almost reminds me of Venn diagrams, :)

Whats the OA?
Just a small point on the bold part.

E would still have been wrong.

E says that -

The USDA prohibits food manufacturers from labeling foods as 'organic' if the foods contains -
1) antibiotics, hormones or pesticides
AND
2) anything that has been irradiated or genetically modified

This suggests that the prohibition would occur not when the food is irradiated or genetically modified. but when the food contains anything that has been irradiated or genetically modified.

So, even with an or, E would have been wrong.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by mj78ind » Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:26 am
niksworth wrote:
hitmis wrote:imo D

E would be right if it mant to say that the food contained either antibiotics, hormones or pesticides and in addition the food was irradiated or genetically modified.

Here it means to say its or of all clause and no ands anywhere.

Almost reminds me of Venn diagrams, :)

Whats the OA?
Just a small point on the bold part.

E would still have been wrong.

E says that -

The USDA prohibits food manufacturers from labeling foods as 'organic' if the foods contains -
1) antibiotics, hormones or pesticides
AND
2) anything that has been irradiated or genetically modified

This suggests that the prohibition would occur not when the food is irradiated or genetically modified. but when the food contains anything that has been irradiated or genetically modified.

So, even with an or, E would have been wrong.
Basic idea ..........logic dictates that all should be "or" since anything on its won can make the food non-USDA approved or whatever it is .........
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:05 am
mj78ind wrote:
Basic idea ..........logic dictates that all should be "or" since anything on its won can make the food non-USDA approved or whatever it is .........
Totally agree. My point was that even with an or, E is incorrect.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1