After an exclusive reasoning on which of the options is the most suitable one that tends to interpret the ministers decision, here is an highlight of each options;

Option A - CORRECT.
However, this statement tends to acknowledge'' the use of underground wiring as an effective means of preventing accumulation of snows on covered roads by the spokesman of the Ministry of transport. Although this alternative has however not been cost effective over the years, due high initial cost.

Option B - INCORRECT.
This statement has diverted from the initial discussion reason why underground wiring has been an option and why it should not be implemented again.

Option C - INCORRECT.
Although, this statement has talked about the budget spent on winter road maintenance in previous year, but in the initial statement by the spokesman of Ministry of transport it wasn't stated that one third was spent on it.

Option D - INCORRECT.
In the initial statement, other countries expenses was not stated as a measure or reason why the continuation of the use of underground wiring should/not be used in preventing accumulation of snows covering the road during the winter period.

Option E - INCORRECT.
Although, in the initial statement, the reason why the official in the ministry opposes the spokesman of the ministry of transport was because of the supposed high cost of running an effective means of preventing accumulation of snows by the use of underground wiring, unlike the usual spreading of salt on the ice- and snow covered roads, which that opposition does not indicate how long the high cost has been in existence.