BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of complete EA OnDemand
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The school board ruling mandating that physically handi

Expert replies
by sanjib » Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:16 pm
The school board ruling mandating that physically handicapped students be placed in regular classroom settings whenever possible also assured all children who have a reading problem of special aid.
(A) be placed in regular classroom settings whenever possible also assured all children who have a reading problem
(B) should be placed in regular classroom settings whenever possible also assures all children that have a reading problem
(C) are placed in regular classroom settings whenever possible also assures those children who are having reading problems
(D) be placed in regular classroom settings whenever possible also assured children with reading problems
(E) should be placed in regular classroom settings whenever possible also has assured all those children with a reading problem

Pls help how the subjunctive rules are applied for the correct answer.Need explanation pls.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by bharathh » Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:31 pm
D has the correct subjunctive tense.

A is too wordy and uses all children when not required.
Join the discussion

by RumpelThickSkin » Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:21 am
Opening this one up again OA is D

1) subjunctive easy to spot - B,C, E out

2) between A & D. A looks better to me than D. Somehow D seems to change the meaning and suggests that the ruling assured the children with reading problems (i.e. bestowed reading problems on them)

Suggestions please
Last edited by RumpelThickSkin on Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:45 am
RumpelThickSkin wrote:between A & D. A looks better to me than D.
If you remove non essential parts of the sentence, it would look something like this.

A) The school board assured all children who have a reading problem of special aid.

Option D would look something like this.
D) The school board assured children with reading problems of special aid.

Lets compare the two
"children who have a reading problem" in A is unnecessarily wordy - "children with reading problem" in D is better
RumpelThickSkin wrote:Somehow D seems to change the meaning and suggests that the ruling assured with reading problems
Correct idiom is "assured X of Y". In D, X is "children with reading problem" and Y is "special aid".

If the correct idiom were "assured X with Y", then the sentence would have meant that the school board ruling will cause reading problems to the children.

In option D "with reading problem" is modifying children. Its not part of the idiom "assured of".

Hope that helps...
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:00 am
hardik.jadeja wrote:
RumpelThickSkin wrote:between A & D. A looks better to me than D.
If you remove non essential parts of the sentence, it would look something like this.

A) The school board assured all children who have a reading problem of special aid.

Option D would look something like this.
D) The school board assured children with reading problems of special aid.

Lets compare the two
"children who have a reading problem" in A is unnecessarily wordy - "children with reading problem" in D is better
RumpelThickSkin wrote:Somehow D seems to change the meaning and suggests that the ruling assured with reading problems

Correct idiom is "assured X of Y". In D, X is "children with reading problem" and Y is "special aid".

If the correct idiom were "assured X with Y", then the sentence would have meant that the school board ruling will cause reading problems to the children.

In option D "with reading problem" is modifying children. Its not part of the idiom "assured of".

Hope that helps...
Good explanation!
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by loveusonu » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:45 am
kevincanspain wrote:
hardik.jadeja wrote:
RumpelThickSkin wrote:between A & D. A looks better to me than D.
If you remove non essential parts of the sentence, it would look something like this.

A) The school board assured all children who have a reading problem of special aid.

Option D would look something like this.
D) The school board assured children with reading problems of special aid.

Lets compare the two
"children who have a reading problem" in A is unnecessarily wordy - "children with reading problem" in D is better
RumpelThickSkin wrote:Somehow D seems to change the meaning and suggests that the ruling assured with reading problems

Correct idiom is "assured X of Y". In D, X is "children with reading problem" and Y is "special aid".

If the correct idiom were "assured X with Y", then the sentence would have meant that the school board ruling will cause reading problems to the children.

In option D "with reading problem" is modifying children. Its not part of the idiom "assured of".

Hope that helps...
Good explanation!
Does that mean OA is wrong?
My question regarding such construction(may sound stupid) ..Wats the main verb over here, I am confused with also over here?
Sonu
--------
When you want something desperately, the whole Universe conspires in helping to give it to you - The Alchemist
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:07 pm
loveusonu wrote: Does that mean OA is wrong?
What part of explanation made you think OA D is wrong?
loveusonu wrote:My question regarding such construction(may sound stupid) ..Wats the main verb over here, I am confused with also over here?
hardik.jadeja wrote: If you remove non essential parts of the sentence, it would look something like this.

A) The school board ruling assured all children who have a reading problem of special aid.

Option D would look something like this.
D) The school board ruling assured children with reading problems of special aid.
I think If you reduce the sentence by removing non essential parts, as i did in my previous post, you would find it easy to identify the main verb of the sentence. Can you identify the main verb in the above highlighted sentences?
Join the discussion

by haveto » Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:24 pm
Hardik - Thanks man!

You rock!
Join the discussion

by ansh.kumar » Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:39 am
so IS ^A^ ruled out only for wordiness?
Join the discussion

by loveusonu » Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:15 pm
hardik.jadeja wrote:
loveusonu wrote: Does that mean OA is wrong?
What part of explanation made you think OA D is wrong?
loveusonu wrote:My question regarding such construction(may sound stupid) ..Wats the main verb over here, I am confused with also over here?
hardik.jadeja wrote: If you remove non essential parts of the sentence, it would look something like this.

A) The school board ruling assured all children who have a reading problem of special aid.

Option D would look something like this.
D) The school board ruling assured children with reading problems of special aid.
I think If you reduce the sentence by removing non essential parts, as i did in my previous post, you would find it easy to identify the main verb of the sentence. Can you identify the main verb in the above highlighted sentences?
oh, I mistakenly thought from your explanation that B has 'of'..
Thanks for rest of the explanation
Sonu
--------
When you want something desperately, the whole Universe conspires in helping to give it to you - The Alchemist
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1