BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The Schlieffen Plan

Expert replies
by pradeepspanchal » Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:40 am
The Schlieffen Plan, which the German army used to invade France in 1914, required that the last man on the right of the German line literally brush the english channel with his sleeve.

A. literally brush
B. was supposed to literally brush
C. would have literally brushed
D. will literally be brushing
E. was to literally brush

I am not able to perform POE in A & E. The sentence is talking about the past and 'was' pinpoints past .
Please Help
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by karanrulz4ever » Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:47 am
According to me the idiom goes like this : require that X Y.

Hence IMO A
Join the discussion

by pradeepspanchal » Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:50 am
@karanrulz4ever,

Could you please suggest what is X and Y here , I am not able to figure out.

Thanks in advance
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:14 am
Require asks for a subjunctive verb form.

E.g.
1) The teacher requires that you do your homework today.
2) The test required that he study for an hour every day.


A is right.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by str1der » Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:15 am
Would definitely go with A
Join the discussion

by kushal.adhia » Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:22 am
I think that the answer is A..

the idiom is : require that X Y

Here, "required that the last man on the right of the German line" is X
and "literally brush the english channel with his sleeve" is Y

u combine the 2 and u get the correct idiom..

Hope this helps

Kushal
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:16 pm
niksworth wrote:Require asks for a subjunctive verb form.

E.g.
1) The teacher requires that you do your homework today.
2) The test required that he study for an hour every day.


A is right.
Also note that many verbs can take either the subjunctive mood or the infinitive form:

The teacher asked that he study for an hour every day OR
The teacher asked him to study for an every day.

Choice E also splits the infinitive ("to literally brush", like "to boldly go"), still considered less desirable by some and incorrect by others.
Join the discussion

by pradeepspanchal » Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:11 pm
Thanks Everyone

I still have doubt on X and Y .The X, Y suggested above seems to be part of an one going clause rather than two disctinct entity. We take X and Y as compareable entity such as in parallelism.

Jim's approach of subjunctive sound's more correct here. So, I see it as a Subjunctive check rather than idiom.

Kindly correct If I am wrong.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1