Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sun Jun 03, 2018 2:50 pm
Timer
00:00
Your answer
Difficulty–

right wrong

Pick an answer to see how members did

The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an environmentally preferable alternative to the prevailing practices of incineration and of dumping in landfills. Recycling is profitable, as the recycling programs already in operation demonstrate. A state legislator proposes that communities should therefore be required to adopt recycling and to reach the target of recycling 50 percent of all solid waste within 5 years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the advisability of implementing the proposal?

(A) Existing recycling programs have been voluntary, with citizen participation ranging from 30 percent in some communities to 80
percent in others.

(B) Existing recycling programs have been restricted to that 20 percent of solid waste that, when reprocessed, can match processed raw
materials in quality and price.

(C) Existing recycling programs have had recurrent difficulties finding purchasers for their materials usually because of quantities too
small to permit cost-effective pickup and transportation.

(D) Some of the materials that can be recycled are the very materials that, when incinerated, produce the least pollution.

(E) Many of the materials that cannot be recycled are also difficult to incinerate.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Jun 10, 2018 5:26 am
Let's review the options in this question in order to be able to choose the most correct answer., let's pro
From option A, it would be seen that the writer's position is being strengthen that recycling id healthy for the environment and good as a business. Though, it is expressed in this option as a voluntary venture which means people could decide to either go into it or not. Clearly, not what we need. Therefore, it is INCORRECT.

Okay, let's proceed to option B, this is also a statement of fact which does not in any way contradict the position of the writer. Contrary opinion on why the advise wouldn't be totally suitable is what we desire from the options available. Absolute INCORRECT too.

In option C this could be what we have been searching for because it comes with a negative inference. Since the recycling programs currently in place have had it difficult in the marketing of their products, it would be advisable to concentrate first on the economic viability of the recycled materials. It is, however, the most CORRECT OPTION

The statement in option D is not consistent because the reason for the adoption of the method of recycling is in bid to reducing the environmental effects of incineration which causes pollution. Hence, it is INCORRECT

Also, the last statement of the solutions to the question is in OPTION E which explains it won't be good to incinerate nor to recycle. Although, the statement did not elaborate further on why it shouldn't be. Therefore, it is INCORRECT
Join the discussion