The police chief argued that first-time
offenders who have no high school diploma
but who have families with a record of crime
will probably break the law again.
A. who have no high school diploma but who
have families with a record of crime
B. without a high school diploma and
families having a criminal record
C. without a high school diploma whose
families have a record of crime
D. whose families have criminal records and
lacking high school diplomas
E. lacking high school diplomas and also
having families having criminal records
[spoiler]what is the problem with A and in C shouldnt "without" and "whose" be connected by a conjuction?? pls explain[/spoiler]
offenders who have no high school diploma
but who have families with a record of crime
will probably break the law again.
A. who have no high school diploma but who
have families with a record of crime
B. without a high school diploma and
families having a criminal record
C. without a high school diploma whose
families have a record of crime
D. whose families have criminal records and
lacking high school diplomas
E. lacking high school diplomas and also
having families having criminal records
[spoiler]what is the problem with A and in C shouldnt "without" and "whose" be connected by a conjuction?? pls explain[/spoiler]
















