BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The oil wells of Borlandia produced so much oil that the

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorLU » Wed Apr 24, 2019 3:32 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Source: Princeton Review

The oil wells of Borlandia produced so much oil that the market was overwhelmed; consumption did not keep pace with production. As a result, oil prices fell. The government of Borlandia attempted to support oil prices through a subsidy scheme: oil producers who voluntarily limited the amount of oil they produced were compensated directly by the government up to a specified maximum payment.

The program instituted by the government of Borlandia, if successful, will not be a net cost to the government. Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for an explanation of how this could be true?

A. Depressed oil prices meant operating losses for oil producers, decreasing the income of oil producers, and thus decreasing the taxes paid to the government by oil producers.
B. Oil production in countries other than Borlandia declined in the same year that Borlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme.
C. In the first quarter after Borlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme, oil production declined 8 percent.
D. Because the government specified a maximum subsidy payment per oil producer, those producers with numerous wells in production received less support per well than those producers with fewer wells in production.
E. Oil producers desiring to qualify for the compensatory scheme could not continue to produce oil and simply withhold it from the market.

The OA is A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

...

by deloitte247 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:29 pm
Repeated answer
Last edited by deloitte247 on Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

....

by deloitte247 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:29 pm
re....
Last edited by deloitte247 on Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

edited

by deloitte247 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:30 pm
OPTION A :- CORRECT
This option explains the aftermath of depressed oil prices and the effect it will have no the taxes being paid to the government which is perfect explanation to why the program instituted by the government which is to support oil prices through subsidy, needs to be successful so that it wont be a net cost to the government.

OPTION B :- INCORRECT
The country in question in the argument in Borlandia, not another country, So this has no way of helping the Borlandia's government.

OPTION C :- INCORRECT
The fact that oil production declined a percent in the first quarter after Borlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme does not give a guarantee that it won't be a net cost to the government.

OPTION D :- INCORRECT
If the scheme doesn't apply on all the oil wells or receive less support due to the fact that it is per oil producer, the scheme might not work effectively as expected, and there will be a decrease in the tax being paid to the government which will eventually lead to it being a net cost to the government.

OPTION E :- INCORRECT
This is true, according to the argument, but it isn't enough explanation to show why the scheme won't be a net cost to the government if it is successful.
Join the discussion