BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The notion of gold being more expensive than

Expert replies
by aspirant2011 » Fri May 20, 2011 9:29 am
The notion of gold being more expensive than ever happens to fit with a larger narrative which also does not square with the facts, namely, that inflation is an imminent threat.

A. of gold being more expensive than ever happens to fit with a larger narrative which also does not square with the facts, namely, that
B. that gold is more expensive as ever happens to fit with a larger narrative that also does not square with the facts, namely,
C. that gold is more expensive than ever happens to fit with a larger narrative that also does not square with the facts, namely, that
D. of gold being more expensive than ever happened to fit with a larger narrative that also did not square with the facts, namely, that
E. that gold is as expensive than ever happens to fit with a larger narrative that also do not square with the facts, namely, that

[spoiler]I have just one doubt i.e is the usage of comma + that correct????because what I am aware of is this we can't use that with a comma because of that being restrictive clause[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by atulmangal » Fri May 20, 2011 10:04 am
Brother, COMMA + THAT is always wrong and i verified this concept from experts like Ron and @E-gmat.

Here, the thing u are looking at is NOT "COMMA + THAT".....look "namely" is acting as a modifier and a modifier appearing in between the sentence is always quoted in between COMMA's...in simple words if chop of the modifier than u also chop of the COMMA's too attached to it. so, for Op C, if u chop of the modifier "namely" then u chop off the COMMA's also. In sum u chop off

comma + namely + comma

after replacing the above u get, OP C:

The notion that gold is more expensive than ever happens to fit with a larger narrative that also does not square with the facts that inflation is an imminent threat.

So u see the green part, there is NO COMMA before THAT.

I hope this clear your doubt. BTW what's the OA???
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Fri May 20, 2011 10:08 am
Thanks a lot Atul :-)....,yup the OA is C .....
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Sat May 21, 2011 10:36 am
I understand that this question checks tense / Idiom ( notion of/that ) . what makes C better than a/ D
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Sun May 22, 2011 6:36 pm
mundasingh123 wrote:I understand that this question checks tense / Idiom ( notion of/that ) . what makes C better than a/ D
The past tenses of D lead a little strangely to the present-tense threat of inflation. If the past narrative was talking about a past imminent threat of inflation, it shouldn't be "is" in the non-underlined part . . . it should be was. If the past narrative were warning of a future imminent threat of inflation, it should be "would be" (since "would be" is the past tense of "will be").
Join the discussion

by champmag » Sun May 22, 2011 11:18 pm
+1 for C.

Thanx Atul for explaination of Comma+that+comma.
Join the discussion

by 786 » Mon May 23, 2011 12:40 am
Is notion of always incorrect ?
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Mon May 23, 2011 6:40 am
786 wrote:Is notion of always incorrect ?
It's always going to be wordy and therefore suspect on the GMAT. It wouldn't surprise me at all if it showed up in RC and CR questions. In addition, a common form of it is "the notion of X being Y", which has the dreaded "being" built in. As always, though, a wordy answer will be correct when all the other answers are grammatically incorrect.
Join the discussion

by 786 » Tue May 24, 2011 4:27 am
Thanks Jim .
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Tue May 24, 2011 4:37 am
Jim@Grockit wrote:
786 wrote:Is notion of always incorrect ?
It's always going to be wordy and therefore suspect on the GMAT. It wouldn't surprise me at all if it showed up in RC and CR questions. In addition, a common form of it is "the notion of X being Y", which has the dreaded "being" built in. As always, though, a wordy answer will be correct when all the other answers are grammatically incorrect.
So This means The notion of is acceptable usage
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1