BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The meaning of "does"

Expert replies
by specialk1975 » Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:28 pm
Whenever the prompt asks "Does the value of X exceed 14?
-Do you approach these type of questions the same way as "IS" questions? If the value for X (given stem 1) is x = 5 , is this a positive result and hence 1 by itself is correct? Or does X actually have to exceed 14.

-I just made this question up. I am just trying to get a handle on this type of question.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cris » Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:33 pm
In that case I belive stem 1 is by itself SUFF.

I think....not 100% sure though...
Join the discussion

by specialk1975 » Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:49 pm
I know , this problem ticks me off. Stupid Semantics!
Join the discussion

by StarDust845 » Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:02 am
Does the value of X exceed 14?

I believe that if we CAN answer one way or other, the stmt(s) is sufficient.

But if we can't answer the question for e.g. 1 < x < 20. Then the stmt is not sufficient.

Calista.
Join the discussion

Re: The meaning of "does"

by rajendrap471 » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:33 am
'Does' means 'Is' here. I am still not confident.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:41 am
"Does" is definitely analagous to "is" in data sufficiency. Other similar words are "are", "were", "could", "can" and pretty much any form of the verb "to be".

We often call this the "yes/no" family of questions. In other words, the question can be answered with a "yes' or a "no". Sometime we can't pin it down and the answer could turn out to be either "yes" or "no".

For a statement to be sufficient in a yes/no question, it must result in either a definite yes or a definite no answer. If a statement results in a "maybe", "sometimes" or "not sure" answer, then it's insufficient.

Here's an example:

Is x > 2?

(1) x > 0

If all we know is that x is greater than 0, then two possible values for x are 1.5 and 50. Is 1.5 > 2? No. Is 50 > 2? Yes. Since the answer could be yes or no, statement (1) is insufficient.

(2) x < 1

If we know that x is less than 1, then every possible value of x will be less than 2. So, if x is less than 1, x is definitely NOT greater than 2. Since the answer is definitely no, statement (2) is sufficient.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion