BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The mayor plans to - OG verbal review

Expert replies
by Jai_itguys » Sat Aug 07, 2010 12:55 am
Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from
them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since
most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city's commercial
district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so
some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?


a) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
b) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department
c) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
d) The city's fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
e) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.

My doubt:

For me there are 2 conclusions in this question:
1) The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since most people now have access to either public or private telephone
2) the city's commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Option e weakens the conclusion 1 and option b weakens conclusion 2. Which one should I choose

OG B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by showbiz » Sat Aug 07, 2010 1:21 am
Jai_itguys wrote:Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from
them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since
most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city's commercial
district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so
some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?


a) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
b) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department
c) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
d) The city's fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
e) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.

My doubt:

For me there are 2 conclusions in this question:
1) The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since most people now have access to either public or private telephone
2) the city's commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Option e weakens the conclusion 1 and option b weakens conclusion 2. Which one should I choose

OG B
"Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?"

The mayor said something he felt, but the editorial has their own opinion, which is in contrast to the mayors opinion. Hence the following is the conclusion.


But the city's commercial
district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so
some alarm boxes are still necessary. - thats your conclusion.
Join the discussion