BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The Hazelton coal-processing

Expert replies
by kvcpk » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:20 am
The Hazelton coal-processing plant is a major employer in the Hazelton area, but national environmental regulations will force it to close if it continues to use old, polluting processing methods. However, to update the plant to use newer, cleaner methods would be so expensive that the plant will close unless it receives the tax break it has requested. In order to prevent a major increase in local unemployment, the Hazelton government is considering granting the plant's request.

Which of the following would be most important for the Hazelton government to determine before deciding whether to grant the plant's request?

(A) Whether the company that owns the plant would open a new plant in another area if the present plant were closed
(B) Whether the plant would employ far fewer workers when updated than it does now
(C) Whether the level of pollutants presently being emitted by the plant is high enough to constitute a health hazard for local residents
(D) Whether the majority of the coal processed by the plant is sold outside the Hazelton area
(E) Whether the plant would be able to process more coal when updated than it does now
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by selango » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:31 am
IMO B.

The govt plan to give tax break only to increase employment.then the govt have to decide whether it continue employ same number of people after updating.

If updated method is used that leads to employing few workers than before,then unemployment will increase.
Then there is no valid reason for govt to give the tax break.
Last edited by selango on Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:34 am
what is wrong with option C?
Join the discussion

by selango » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:40 am
The plant is closed because it uses the older polluting method.If the govt plan to give to tax break, then surely the new cleaner method will be used.So the pollution problem will not arises.

Also government need not to evaluate Option C again,bcoz due to pollution reasons only the plant is closed.
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:51 am
Though option B looks a better choice, I see nothing wrong with option C. Why shouldnt the govt check if the level of pollutants presently being emitted by the plant is high enough to constitute a health hazard for local residents ?
Join the discussion

by jube » Fri Jun 25, 2010 6:00 am
Hazelton govt. is considering granting the plant's request to prevent a major increase in local unemployment. Point C is totally irrelevant for this.
Join the discussion

by selango » Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:50 am
The conclusion is based on govt decision to increase employment.So govt needs to evaluate the situation regarding employment.

Option C deals with pollution level that does not any effect on Employment.
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:19 pm
jube wrote:Hazelton govt. is considering granting the plant's request to prevent a major increase in local unemployment. Point C is totally irrelevant for this.
This makes sense.. Thanks Jube..
Join the discussion