BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

The growth of the railroads

Expert replies
by satishchandra » Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:05 am
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by
when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing
from city to city, and to the
establishment of regional times.
(A)which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
differing
(B)which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and which
differed
(C)which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
differing
(D)determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differed
(E)determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing

OA:E
However, D looked fine to me.
Can you explain where did I go wrong?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by gmatblood » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:14 am
i went with D as well!!
Join the discussion

by patanjali.purpose » Sun Jan 15, 2012 5:02 pm
satishchandra wrote:The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by
when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing
from city to city, and to the
establishment of regional times.
(A)which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
differing
(B)which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and which
differed
(C)which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
differing
(D)determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differed
(E)determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing

OA:E
However, D looked fine to me.
Can you explain where did I go wrong?
We need DIFFERING as the doer is LOCAL TIMES. Local times were differing from city to city. The construction is in active voice

We need DETERMINED as the logical subject is "WHEN THE SUN...". Construction is in passive voice

IMO E
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:28 am
please refer this awesome explanation by Erin in urch.com

https://www.urch.com/forums/faqs/700-gma ... l#post1544
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:28 am
Hi,

I received a PM to explain this sentence.

The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by
when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing
from city to city, and to the
establishment of regional times.

Image

"¢ The growth of the railroads led to
o the abolition of local times, and
o the establishment of regional times.
"¢ Two characteristics of local times have been mentioned in the sentence:
o they were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian, and
they differed from city to city.

Image

1. Singular verb "was" does not agree in number with plural subject "local times". SV must agree in number error.

2. Also "was" seem to be the verb for "abolition of local times", meaning abolition was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian. This is certainly not the intended logical meaning of the sentence. Meaning error.

3. The two characteristics of "local times" must be parallel to each other. Here, "which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian" (a clause) is not parallel to "differing from city to city" ( a verb-ed modifier phrase). Parallelism error.

POE:

(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
differing: Incorrect. Errors discussed above.

(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and which
differed: Incorrect. Same SV number agreement and meaning errors as in A.

(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
differing: Incorrect. Same parallelism error as in A.

(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differed: Incorrect. "determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian" (a verb-ed modifier) is not parallel to "differed from city to city" (a verb phrase). Notice here that "determined" is not a verb here. It is a verb-ed modifier that is modifying "local times". If it were a verb, ther would be no comma before it and the subject and the verb would be connected properly.

(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing: Correct. "determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian" (a verb-ed modifier phrase) is parallel to "differing from city to city" (a verb-ing modifier phrase). Both the modifiers are correctly presenting the characteristics of "local times". Refer to OG 12#42 to see how verb-ing and verb-ed modifiers can be parallel to each other.

Image

1. SV pair must always agree in number.
2. SV pair must always make sense together.
3. In a list of parallelism, all the entities must be grammatically as well as logically parallel.

The concepts tested in this sentence have been covered in e-gmat concepts:
1. Level 1 - SV - Agree in Number (This concept features in Level 1 Preview Concepts that are available for free. Just register and learn.)
2. Level 2 - SV - Make Sense
3. Level 1 - Parallelism - Identify and Correct
4. Level 1 - Parallelism - Helpful Tips

Hope this helps.
Shraddha

Image
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:56 am
In C,

determined

parallel with

differing

Why C is wrong?. Pls, help.
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:58 am
duongthang wrote:In C,

determined

parallel with

differing

Why C is wrong?. Pls, help.
Hi @duongthang,

Choice C is incorrect because "were determined" is a verb that cannot be grammatically parallel to "differing", verb-ing modifier. If "differing" were "differed", then the two entities would be parallel as both would be verbs.

Thanks.
Shraddha
Join the discussion

by Sharma_Gaurav » Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:14 am
Shradhha, can you please clear one more doubt -
Here doesn't which refer to " local times " ? As i have learnt that which always refer to the noun before it and before comma.

So how can here which refer to the phrase " abolition of local times "? And that is why i selected
option C as the answer.
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Mon Jan 30, 2012 6:33 am
Sharma_Gaurav wrote:Shradhha, can you please clear one more doubt -
Here doesn't which refer to " local times " ? As i have learnt that which always refer to the noun before it and before comma.

So how can here which refer to the phrase " abolition of local times "? And that is why i selected
option C as the answer.
Hi Gaurav,
Choice C is not correct because of the parallelism error that I have already explained in above explanations. If you see the POE in the detailed solution, you will see that choice C has been eliminated because if the parallelism issue.

Thanks.
Shraddha
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:35 pm
Meaning:
local times ware determined - CORRECT ; passive voice -> past participle -> determined
local times determined - not the intended meaning

local times differed - CORRECT ; active voice -> present participle -> differing
local times were differed - not the intended meaning
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:59 am
Thanks a ton Shradha, I understand E is correct.

If C would have been
which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
which were differing


I guess this sentence would have been gramatically correct. What do u say?
and also,
dont you think D should have reaches and not reached?
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

by EducationAisle » Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:07 am
sachindia wrote: If C would have been
which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
which were differing


I guess this sentence would have been gramatically correct. What do u say?
I would say:

which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
which differed
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:55 pm
Thanks Ashish,
why not?
which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
which were differing
and why?
which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and
which differed
and also,
dont you think D should have reaches and not reached?
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

by EducationAisle » Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:48 am
The entire sentence is in simple past and so, past continuous (were differing) is not the most optimal choice.

That is also the reason for reached to be preferred over reaches.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:47 pm
That is also the reason for reached to be preferred over reaches.
but in D , you have differing which is in continuous and here differing plays a adjective modifier . why shouldn't D have reaches then?
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion