BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The form the rec should be in?

Launched April 26, 2006
Expert replies
by AceIt » Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:45 pm
Hello Stacy and Amy :-) Thanks in advance for your help. I just read a first draft of my employer's Stanford recommendation on my behalf, and he basically answered the questions in paragraph form so it looks like this:

Question
Answer

Question
Answer

etc.

I had thought the best- and most compelling format- was to answer the questions within the body of a recommendation in letter form. Your advice would be appreciated. Also, Stanford recommends 2-4 pages- what do you think is a good length? At least 2-3?

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Ask Stacy Blackman |

by Amy » Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:01 am
Hi AceIt,

It's most important that the questions are answered and that your recommender cites very specific examples to support his comments about you. Rather than "AceIt is fantastic and in the top 1% of his peer group." he should support such assertions with examples: "AceIt had responsibilities to perform the due diligence during our acquisition of widget industries, which was far beyond the typical analyst duties. AceIt did an excellent job of leading the group to perform the required analysis and we were able to successfully ascertain our risk in the project. Therefore, I would rank AceIt in the top 1% of his peer group."

I think anywhere in the recommended range is fine for length. The format is not especially important here, most people submit in the format you say your letter is in, and I think it is generally preferable to a letter style format because you are ensured that all questions are answered. Content is the single most important factor.

Good luck!

Amy
Amy
Consultant
Stacy Blackman Consulting
Join the discussion

Thanks very much!!

by AceIt » Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:49 am
That was a great answer! Thanks! :-D
Join the discussion