BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The fight against the drug trade

Expert replies
by patanjali.purpose » Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:59 pm
The fight against the drug trade in Country X should focus for the time being on tightening the country's borders and targeting its major smugglers. Wiping out poppy fields in rural areas means even greater hardship for an economically depressed farming population. Rather, the United Nations and the government of Country X must carefully rebuild agricultural infrastructure in areas where the economy depends on these poppy fields.

What purpose do the two boldface sentences serve in the passage?

1) The first is the conclusion drawn by the speaker; the second is the alternative to that conclusion.
2) The first is a short-term solution to a problem; the second is a long-term solution to the same problem.
3) The first presents a problem; the second poses an ideal solution to the problem.
4) The first presents a popular solution to a problem; the second presents a solution preferred by the author.
5) The first presents an argument; the second presents evidence to support the argument.

MGMAT; OA-[spoiler]B;[/spoiler]

[spoiler]E- MGMAT solution says 1st and 2nd statments are ARGUMENTS. E is wrong because it says 2nd statement is EVIDENCE. Why MGMAT says 1st and 2nd statements are ARGUMENTS - what is argument?[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:32 pm
I think the big giveaway that the two bolded portions are arguments (or more specifically, conclusions) is the use of "should" in the first and "must" in the second. This means that they are not statements of fact (premises).
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by patanjali.purpose » Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:46 pm
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:I think the big giveaway that the two bolded portions are arguments (or more specifically, conclusions) is the use of "should" in the first and "must" in the second. This means that they are not statements of fact (premises).
Thanks Bill,

So arguments are anything that is not FACT! Pls advice.
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:29 am
We know premises must be 100% true on the GMAT. The conclusion is what we're trying to prove using those facts, but that doesn't mean it is necessarily true. It is often an opinion, and verbs like "should" help us recognize that.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion