BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Fri Aug 24, 2018 1:34 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, with growing prosperity in Baurisia has come a steadily increasing per capita consumption of meat, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income in Baurisia is almost certain to rise further but increases in domestic grain production are highly unlikely, Baurisia is soon to become an importer of grain.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) When people increase their consumption of meat, they also tend to increase their consumption of grain.

(B) The per capita consumption of meat in Baurisia is roughly the same accross all income levels.

(C) Per capita consumption of meat has not increased substantially in recent years in those countries from which Baurisia is likely to import meat.

(D) It is more economical for Baurisians to import meat than grain.

(E) During Baurisia's years of growing prosperity, the country's population has remained relatively stable.

OA D

Source: GMAT Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Mon Sep 03, 2018 10:12 am
Option A - INCORRECT.
This option is in support of the reasoning, which is the fact that Baurisia is soon to become an importer of grain because, when people increase their consumption of meat, they also tend to increase their consumption of grain since it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat.

Option B - INCORRECT.
The per capital consumption of meat in Baurisia is roughly the same across all income levels. This is the reason why there will be some importation policy o grains so as to continue to meet up with the high demand of meat which one of its highest production ingredient is grains.

Option C - INCORRECT.
Baurisia is certain about importation of grains from other countries. Per capital consumption of meat has not increased substantially in recent years in those countries from which Baurisia is likely to import grains from, because their level of consumption of meat and grains can't be compared to that of Baurisia.

Option D - CORRECT.
This option has seriously weaken the argument to which the Baurisia Government has proven in the argument. Since Baurisia already is a meat and grain producing country, It is more economical for Baurisians to ''produce'' than ''import'' meat than grain. However, the reason why Baurisia is considering an importation of grains from other countries is because there is a certainty of increase in the per capital income and also the increase in population and demand for meat by the citizens, which domestic grains production which is as the sole ingredient used in producing meats is unlikely to increase speedily to meet up with the high demand of meat which has helped increase the economy. Therefore, a consideration of importation of grains is better than importation of meat to the Baurisia government.

Option E - INCORRECT.
This option is not certain about the information given in the argument by saying ''the country's population has remained relatively stable''. Because, according to the argument it is presumably that, there has been an increasing population and also this has lead to an increasing demand for meat in Baurisia.
Join the discussion