BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The Central City Church building(MGMAT)

Expert replies
by alivapriyada » Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:14 pm
The Central City Church building was recently damaged by a fire that occurred overnight. The insurance company will not pay on a claim if it is determined that a fire was started deliberately. Since nobody was in the Central City Church building at the time the fire swept through the structure, the insurance company will most certainly reimburse the church for the damage caused by the fire.

Which of the following is an assumption that is required to reach the conclusion above?

A. Fire damages are generally the most expensive type of loss that insurance companies cover.

B. There was no one in the building at the time the fire swept through the structure.

C. No individual would fraudulently profit by setting a fire in the church building.

D. The insurance company typically pays claims for similar situations in other non-residential structures, such as office buildings and restaurants.

E. The fire was not deliberately started by someone who then left the building before the fire grew.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by singhsa » Sat Sep 25, 2010 12:04 am
IMO E

A - Irrelevant
B - A fact already stated in the premise. Can't be an assumption.
C - Negate it. Some individuals would deliberately start the fire. So what? Irrelevant
D - Office buildings and restaurants are out of scope.
E- Answer. Insurance company is reimbursing the church because nobody was found in the church when the fire took place. So the company thinks that there was no human involvement in the fire. but, if we negate E, this would totally contradict the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by alivapriyada » Sat Sep 25, 2010 12:07 am
singhsa wrote:IMO E

A - Irrelevant
B - A fact already stated in the premise. Can't be an assumption.
C - Negate it. Some individuals would deliberately start the fire. So what? Irrelevant
D - Office buildings and restaurants are out of scope.
E- Answer. Insurance company is reimbursing the church because nobody was found in the church when the fire took place. So the company thinks that there was no human involvement in the fire. but, if we negate E, this would totally contradict the conclusion.
OA is E
many thanks!!!
Join the discussion