BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

the bones

Expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by reachac » Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:01 am
In C, "closely resembled" without the use of "that" is awkward, also C seem to suggest that the resemblance that once existed is no more there.
Join the discussion

by drgmatIL » Fri Aug 08, 2008 8:36 am
in A there is no parall... problem "and closely" ?
Join the discussion

by reachac » Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:29 am
drgmatIL wrote:in A there is no parall... problem "and closely" ?[/quote
Sorry but couldnt get ur point, can u elaborate.
Btw A has perfect parallelism in that both the items connected by the conjunction 'and' are in present tense.
Join the discussion

by drgmatIL » Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:36 am
reachac,

distant relative .... and closly .... are not parral...

please explain to me the parallelism
Join the discussion

by reachac » Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:46 am
drgmatIL wrote:reachac,

distant relative .... and closly .... are not parral...

please explain to me the parallelism
Ok leme try, Im real bad at explaining it to other tough pls pardon my shortcomin.

Wat do u think of this construction.

X is Y and X does Z??

Seems parallel?
Join the discussion

by drgmatIL » Fri Aug 08, 2008 9:47 pm
reachac,
not for me :)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1