BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The ancient Nubians--Assumption!

Expert replies
by amysky_0205 » Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:04 am
The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

A. The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.
B. The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline.
C. Typhus is generally fatal.
D. Nubian grain became contaminated with tetracycline-producing bacteria prior to being harvested.
E. Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.

is this OA A or D??

can someone explain~ thank u!!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Deepthi Subbu » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:58 pm
The OA is definitely A. What if tera-cycline was formed after the bodies were buried. It means that there was a different reason for the low incidence of typhus .

Coming to D, before or after harvesting doesnot matter. What matters is consumption and effect of teracycline on typhus.
Join the discussion

by aman88 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:55 am
amysky_0205 wrote:The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

A. The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.
B. The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline.
C. Typhus is generally fatal.
D. Nubian grain became contaminated with tetracycline-producing bacteria prior to being harvested.
E. Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.

is this OA A or D??

can someone explain~ thank u!!!
It's always better to perform a Negation Test in assumption CR questions.

Negation test is, negating the answer choices and then seeing whether the conclusion is still valid. If after negation, the conclusion falls apart, then that answer choice is the correct answer.

Lets try this here.

Conclusion: 'tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.' [And 'tetracycline' is something that prevents the disease.]

Choice A: The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.
Negate it: The tetracycline deposits may have formed after the bodies were buried.

After negating choice A, the conclusion falls apart. Therefore, A is the right answer.
Try this on other choices and see for yourself how the conclusion remains.

:)
Thanks.
Join the discussion

by charu_mahajan » Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:38 pm
aman88 has nailed it...Though I remember doing a different version of this question where the answer choice was - The tetracycline was not lost while cooking (Making bread and beer) - something like this.
Join the discussion