Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

TestPrep

Expert replies
by moneyman » Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:43 am
Is m+z>0 ??

(1) m-3z>0
(2)4z-m>0

Fromt this I deduced that 3z<m<4z and the expression can be positive as well as negative right??

Pls help!!

Ans is C
Maxx
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: TestPrep

by camitava » Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:48 am
moneyman wrote:Is m+z>0 ??

(1) m-3z>0
(2)4z-m>0

Fromt this I deduced that 3z<m<4z> 0 or z > 0
If z > 0, m > 3z i.e. m > 0
So m + z > 0

So go for C. Got me, Maxx?
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:06 am
Though I have not started working on inequalities, so it is hard for me to understand the above solution posted by Camitava.

However, there is also another way to solve this problem without having much knowledge about inequalities. Here it goes:-

Statement 1: m - 3z > 0 => m > 3z
Statement 2: 4Z - m > 0 => 4z > m

From both statement as you deduce that 4z > m > 3z

Now lets check the solution with negative values to prove that m + z < 0

Lets take z = -1 (simplest one)
i.e -4 > m > -3
which is incorrect as -4 can't greater than -3.

Now lets check with some negative fractional value.
Lets take -1/12 (divisible by both 3 and 4)

therefore equation becomes, -0.33 > m > -0.25, which again incorrect, as -0.33 cannot be greater than -0.25

So, it means z cannot be negative. So, if z is not negative, then m also cannot be negative.

Therefore adding 2 positive number yields a positive number.
i.e. m + z > 0

There C is the answer
Last edited by codesnooker on Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:27 am, edited 3 times in total.
Join the discussion

Re: TestPrep

by codesnooker » Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:09 am
camitava wrote:
From this I deduced that 3z<m<4z> 0 or z > 0
Hi Camitava, Can you explain here how you have taken z > 0 ?

I didn't understand this point.
Join the discussion

Re: TestPrep

by camitava » Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:49 am
codesnooker wrote:
camitava wrote:
From this I deduced that 3z<m<4z> 0 or z > 0
Hi Camitava, Can you explain here how you have taken z > 0 ?

I didn't understand this point.

Sorry! I really don;t know how did I mess up while posting my last post.

I meant to say that - add the two equs : m-3z>0
and 4z-m>0.
So m - 3z + 4z - m > 0
or z > 0
From this m > 3z or m > 0
So m + z > 0

Got me, Codesnooker?
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

by camitava » Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:51 am
Ohhh! Got it now... Last time I forgot to uncheck the option - Disable HTML in this post or may be I messed up in some other way ...
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:52 am
Sure, thanks
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:29 am
Yes HTML code is ruining the answers in case of questions of inequalities. Disable them, before posting answers or questions of inequalities
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:02 am
Just as a general tip, you can turn html off under your profile and then just unclick the box if you ever decide you need it.

As a quick point on this discussion (if it's even needed anymore), Codesnooker got to:
From both statement as you deduce that 4z > m > 3z
From here, we can see that:

4z > 3z

which can only be true if z is positive.

And, since m > 3z, this means that m is also positive.

So, since both z and m are positive, it must be true that:

m + z

is also positive.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by cjiang16 » Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:41 pm
C is the answer.
Join the discussion